Suppr超能文献

糖尿病自我管理教育计划:一项基于全国人口的参与者特征、计划评分和不参与原因的研究结果。

Diabetes self-management education programs: Results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participation.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.

Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Unit Physical Health, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0310338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310338. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Population-based studies of reasons for not participating in diabetes self-management education (DSME) are scarce. Therefore, we investigated what sociodemographic and disease-related factors are associated with participation in DSME, the reasons for not participating in DSME and how participants evaluate DSME.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used data from the nationwide survey "Disease knowledge and information needs-Diabetes mellitus 2017", which included a total of 1396 participants diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (diabetes; n = 394 DSME-participants, n = 1002 DSME-never-participants). Analyses used weighted logistic or multinominal regression analyses with bivariate and multivariable approaches.

RESULTS

Participants were more likely to attend DSME if they had a medium (OR 1.82 [95%CI 1.21-2.73]),or high (OR 2.04 [95%CI 1.30-3.21]) level of education, had type 1 diabetes (OR 2.46 [1.24-4.90]) and insulin treatment (OR 1.96 [95%CI 1.33-2.90]). Participants were less likely to attend DSME if they lived in East Germany (OR 0.57 [95%CI 0.39-0.83]), had diabetes for >2 to 5 years (OR 0.52 [95%CI 0.31-0.88] compared to >5 years), did not agree that diabetes is a lifelong disease (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.15-0.62], had never been encouraged by their physician to attend DSME (OR 0.19 [95%CI 0.13-0.27]) and were not familiar with disease management programs (OR 0.67 [95%CI 0.47-0.96]). The main reasons for non-participation were participant's personal perception that DSME was not necessary (26.6%), followed by lack of recommendation from treating physician (25.7%) and lack of information on DSME (20.7%). DSME-participants found DSME more helpful if they had a medium educational level (OR 2.06 [95%CI 1.10-3.89] ref: low level of education) and less helpful if they were never encouraged by their treatment team (OR 0.46 [95%CI 0.26-0.82]).

DISCUSSION

Professionals treating persons with diabetes should encourage their patients to attend DSME and underline that diabetes is a lifelong disease. Overall, the majority of DSME participants rated DSME as helpful.

摘要

目的

针对未参与糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)的原因进行基于人群的研究较为少见。因此,我们调查了哪些社会人口统计学和疾病相关因素与参与 DSME 相关,不参与 DSME 的原因以及参与者如何评估 DSME。

研究设计和方法

我们使用了全国性调查“疾病知识和信息需求-2017 年 2 型糖尿病”的数据,该调查共包括 1396 名被诊断患有糖尿病(糖尿病;n = 394 名 DSME 参与者,n = 1002 名 DSME 未参与者)。分析采用加权逻辑或多项回归分析,包括双变量和多变量方法。

结果

如果参与者具有中等(OR 1.82 [95%CI 1.21-2.73])或高等(OR 2.04 [95%CI 1.30-3.21])教育水平,患有 1 型糖尿病(OR 2.46 [1.24-4.90])和胰岛素治疗(OR 1.96 [95%CI 1.33-2.90]),则更有可能参加 DSME。如果参与者居住在东德(OR 0.57 [95%CI 0.39-0.83]),糖尿病病史>2 至 5 年(OR 0.52 [95%CI 0.31-0.88],与>5 年相比),不认为糖尿病是一种终身疾病(OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.15-0.62]),从未被医生鼓励参加 DSME(OR 0.19 [95%CI 0.13-0.27]),并且不熟悉疾病管理计划(OR 0.67 [95%CI 0.47-0.96]),则不太可能参加 DSME。不参加的主要原因是参与者个人认为 DSME 不必要(26.6%),其次是治疗医生未推荐(25.7%)和缺乏有关 DSME 的信息(20.7%)。如果参与者具有中等教育水平(OR 2.06 [95%CI 1.10-3.89],参考低教育水平),则 DSME 参与者认为 DSME 更有帮助,如果他们从未得到治疗团队的鼓励(OR 0.46 [95%CI 0.26-0.82]),则认为 DSME 帮助较小。

讨论

治疗糖尿病患者的专业人员应鼓励他们的患者参加 DSME,并强调糖尿病是一种终身疾病。总体而言,大多数 DSME 参与者认为 DSME 有帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d809/11392325/6bf04e8759d3/pone.0310338.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验