Li Qiu-Yu, Su Ting, Shi Wen-Qing, Fang Jian-Wen, Zhang Meng-Yao, Xu Qian-Hui, Liang Rong-Bin, Ge Qian-Min, Li Biao, Shao Yi
Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Nanchang 330006, China.
Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Xiamen 361102, China.
Dis Markers. 2022 Apr 23;2022:2883029. doi: 10.1155/2022/2883029. eCollection 2022.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) appears to be a high risk of spread. This research investigated the correlation between a different range of clinical features and intraocular metastasis (IOM) in RCC patients and attempted to determine potential risk factors of RCC patients with IOM. In the study, there are a total of 351 patients with RCC that were recruited between May 1994 and May 2016. The differences between RCC patients with IOM and RCC patients with non-IOM (NIOM) were evaluated by the chi-squared test and Student test. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to determine risk factors. Finally, the value of diagnosis for RCC patients with IOM was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Eighteen individuals were identified with IOM. There were no significant differences that were detected in alkaline phosphatase (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), cancer antigen 153 (CA-153), cancer antigen 199 (CA-199), calcium, age, primary tumor site, and histopathological subtypes between the two groups. But there was a difference in terms of gender ( < 0.05). The IOM group exhibited significantly higher neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and lower hemoglobin (Hb) values compared to the NIOM group ( < 0.05, respectively). Binary logistic regression identified NSE and Hb as significant risk factors of IOM for RCC patient ( < 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively). The ROC curve analysis indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) values of NSE and Hb were 0.694 and 0.749, while cut-off values were 49.5 ng/mL and 102.5 g/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of NSE were 72.2% and 66.4%, respectively, while those of Hb were 72.2% and 74.2%, respectively. The result reveals that NSE and Hb represent promising significant risk factors of IOM for RCC patients. Notably, Hb is more reliable than NSE in distinguishing case of IOM from NIOM in patients with RCC.
肾细胞癌(RCC)似乎具有较高的扩散风险。本研究调查了RCC患者不同范围的临床特征与眼内转移(IOM)之间的相关性,并试图确定发生IOM的RCC患者的潜在风险因素。在该研究中,共招募了1994年5月至2016年5月期间的351例RCC患者。通过卡方检验和Student检验评估了发生IOM的RCC患者与未发生IOM(NIOM)的RCC患者之间的差异。应用二元逻辑回归分析来确定风险因素。最后,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估了发生IOM的RCC患者的诊断价值。确定了18例发生IOM的患者。两组之间在甲胎蛋白(AFP)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、癌抗原125(CA - 125)、癌抗原153(CA - 153)、癌抗原199(CA - 199)、血钙、年龄、原发肿瘤部位和组织病理学亚型方面未检测到显著差异。但在性别方面存在差异(<0.05)。与NIOM组相比,IOM组的神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)显著更高,血红蛋白(Hb)值更低(分别为<0.05)。二元逻辑回归确定NSE和Hb是RCC患者发生IOM的显著风险因素(分别为<0.05和<0.001)。ROC曲线分析表明,NSE和Hb的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.694和0.749,而临界值分别为49.5 ng/mL和102.5 g/L。NSE的敏感性和特异性分别为72.2%和66.4%,而Hb的敏感性和特异性分别为72.2%和74.2%。结果表明,NSE和Hb是RCC患者发生IOM的有前景的显著风险因素。值得注意的是,在区分RCC患者的IOM病例与NIOM病例方面,Hb比NSE更可靠。