Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Suita Tokushukai Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Jul;38(7):1059-1068. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2070379. Epub 2022 May 6.
Rivaroxaban is commonly prescribed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although lower than standard dosages (under-dosing) may be administered in the real-world setting, data on subsequent clinical outcomes in Japanese patients are lacking.
The prospective, multicenter, observational J'xactly study enrolled patients with acute symptomatic/asymptomatic deep vein thromboses (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or both, who were prescribed rivaroxaban. This subanalysis investigated patient characteristics and outcomes associated with rivaroxaban under-dosing.
Among 1016 evaluable patients, 667 (65.6%) received an initial standard dosage of rivaroxaban (30 mg/day) and 349 (34.4%) received an initial under-dosage (20 mg/day, = 22; 15 mg/day, = 282; and 10 mg/day, = 45). Those receiving an under-dose had significantly lower body weight and slower pulse rate compared with the standard-dose group regardless of DVT or PE status. Under-dosing was common for distal DVTs, but less frequent for massive/submassive PEs. There were no differences between under-dose and standard-dose groups in the incidences of recurring symptomatic VTEs (DVT: 1.77% vs. 3.35% per patient-year, = .138; PE: 0.84% vs. 2.84% per patient-year, = .208) or major bleeding (DVT: 3.55% vs. 3.41% per patient-year, = .960; PE: not observed vs. 2.83% per patient-year, = .132).
In the real-world setting, rivaroxaban under-dosing for patients with VTE occurred in those with lower body weight, slower pulse rate, distal DVT, or non-massive PEs. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes for patients received under-dose of rivaroxaban at the discretion of the physicians in the clinical practice compared with those received standard dose of rivaroxaban.
利伐沙班常用于预防静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)。虽然在真实世界环境中可能会给予较低剂量(剂量不足),但缺乏日本患者后续临床结局的数据。
这项前瞻性、多中心、观察性的 J'xactly 研究纳入了接受利伐沙班治疗的急性有症状/无症状深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、肺栓塞(PE)或两者均有的患者。这项亚分析调查了与利伐沙班剂量不足相关的患者特征和结局。
在 1016 例可评估患者中,667 例(65.6%)接受了初始标准剂量的利伐沙班(30mg/天),349 例(34.4%)接受了初始剂量不足(20mg/天,n=22;15mg/天,n=282;10mg/天,n=45)。无论 DVT 或 PE 状态如何,接受低剂量的患者体重明显较轻,脉搏率较慢。对于远端 DVT,剂量不足很常见,但对于大面积/次大面积 PE 则不太常见。在复发有症状 VTE(DVT:1.77% vs. 3.35%/患者年,n=0.138;PE:0.84% vs. 2.84%/患者年,n=0.208)或主要出血(DVT:3.55% vs. 3.41%/患者年,n=0.960;PE:未观察到 vs. 2.83%/患者年,n=0.132)的发生率方面,剂量不足组和标准剂量组之间无差异。
在真实世界环境中,体重较轻、脉搏较慢、DVT 远端或非大面积 PE 的 VTE 患者会出现利伐沙班剂量不足。与接受标准剂量利伐沙班的患者相比,医生酌情给予利伐沙班剂量不足的患者在临床实践中的临床结局没有统计学上的显著差异。