Non-ECG-gated high-pitch CT angiography versus hybrid ECG-gated CT angiography for aorta using 512-slice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports comparing image quality and radiation dose of aorta computed tomography angiography (CTA) between the high-pitch and the hybrid technique.

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality and radiation dose among non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch CTA and hybrid ECG-gated CTA of the aorta using 512-slice CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 110 patients who underwent non-ECG-gated high-pitch CTA (group 1) or hybrid ECG-gated CTA (group 2) of the entire aorta. Interpretability, image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the mean effective radiation dose were compared.

RESULTS

The mean image noise of the whole aorta was significantly lower (15.7 ± 1.8 HU vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 HU,  = 0.008) in group 1 than in group 2. The CNR (22.3 ± 4.7 vs. 20.0 ± 3.9,  < 0.001) and SNR (26.5 ± 4.9 vs. 23.2 ± 4.0,  < 0.001) were higher in group 2 compared with group 1. Neither group showed a significant difference in interpretability of the ascending aorta, cardiac chamber, aortic valve, right ostium, and left ostium (all  = 1). The mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.9 mSv vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 mSv,  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The non-ECG-gated high-pitch technique shows significantly improved CNR and SNR due to reduced noise with lower radiation exposure. The interpretability of the cardiac structure, ascending aorta, aortic valve, and both ostia did not differ significantly between the two groups.