Reply by McCormack to Townsend and Cowl, and to Miller .
作者信息
McCormack Meredith, Balasubramanian Aparna, Wise Robert A, Keet Corinne A, Matsui Elizabeth C, Peng Roger D
机构信息
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland.
Dell Medical School Austin, Texas.
出版信息
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):795-796. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0378LE.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply by McCormack to Townsend and Cowl, and to Miller .麦科马克对汤森德、考尔以及米勒的回复。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):795-796. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0378LE.
2
Reply by Elmaleh-Sachs . to Townsend and Cowl, and to Miller .埃尔马莱-萨克斯对汤森德和考尔以及米勒的回复
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):792-795. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0628LE.
3
Reply to Townsend and Cowl.对汤森和考尔的回复。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):796-797. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0655LE.
4
Reply to Townsend: The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society 2019 Spirometry Statement and Occupational Spirometry Testing in the United States.对汤森的回复：美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会2019年肺量计声明与美国的职业肺量计检测
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 15;201(8):1012. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2530LE.
5
Reply to Miller: Race-Specific Interpretation of Spirometry.对米勒的回复：肺量计的种族特异性解读
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1461-1462. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-610LE.
6
Reply to Vazquez Guillamet et al. and to Magnussen et al.: "Normalization of FEV/FVC Ratio to Greater Than 0.7 Does Not Equal Resolution of Disease" and "Spirometry Variability Must Be Critically Interpreted before Negating a Clinical Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease".对巴斯克斯·吉利亚梅特等人及马格努森等人的回复：“FEV/FVC 比值正常化至大于 0.7 并不等同于疾病的缓解”以及“在否定慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床诊断之前，必须审慎解读肺量计测量结果的变异性”
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 15;197(6):836-837. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-1994LE.
7
Reply to W. E. Rosa et al and T. N. Townsend et al.对W. E. 罗萨等人及T. N. 汤森德等人的回复
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;40(3):312-314. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02383. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
8
Reply to Vaz Fragoso et al.: Spirometry-based Diagnostic Criteria That Are Not Age-Appropriate Lack Clinical Relevance.对瓦斯·弗拉戈索等人的回复：基于肺活量测定法的诊断标准若不符合年龄特点则缺乏临床相关性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 1;197(7):964-965. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2031LE.
9
Reply to Haynes : Calibration Myths in the 2019American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Spirometry Technical Standards.对海恩斯的回复：2019年美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会肺量计技术标准中的校准误区
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 15;202(2):304. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0728LE.
10
Reply to: Comment on: polarity effects and apparent ion recombination in microionization chambers [Med. Phys. 43(5) 2141-2152 (2016)].回复：对《微电离室中的极性效应和表观离子复合》的评论[《医学物理》43(5) 2141 - 2152 (2016)] 。
Med Phys. 2017 Mar;44(3):1206-1207. doi: 10.1002/mp.12084. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
本文引用的文献
1
Genetic Ancestry to Improve Precision of Race/Ethnicity-based Lung Function Equations in Children.利用遗传血统提高基于种族/族裔的儿童肺功能方程的精准度。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 15;205(6):725-727. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2088LE.
2
Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.重新考虑种族特异性肺功能预测方程的实用性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;205(7):819-829. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1246OC.
3
Race/Ethnicity, Spirometry Reference Equations, and Prediction of Incident Clinical Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Lung Study.种族/族裔、肺量计参考方程与临床事件发生的预测：动脉粥样硬化多族裔研究（MESA）肺部研究
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 15;205(6):700-710. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1612OC.
4
Race, Lung Function, and Long-Term Mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.第三次全国健康与营养检查调查中的种族、肺功能与长期死亡率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 15;205(6):723-724. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202104-0822LE.
5
Race and Genetic Ancestry in Medicine - A Time for Reckoning with Racism.医学中的种族与遗传血统——正视种族主义的时刻
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):474-480. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2029562. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations.用于 3-95 岁年龄范围的肺量测定的多民族参考值：全球肺功能 2012 方程。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Dec;40(6):1324-43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
7
The relationship between reduced lung function and cardiovascular mortality: a population-based study and a systematic review of the literature.肺功能降低与心血管疾病死亡率之间的关系：一项基于人群的研究及对文献的系统综述
Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):1952-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.1952.
8
Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society.肺功能测试：参考值的选择与解读策略。美国胸科学会。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1202-18. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1202.
Zotero 插件