Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
J Surg Res. 2022 Sep;277:211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.03.029. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
The precise mechanism through which excessive tension confers poor outcomes in nerve gap repair is yet to be elucidated. Furthermore, the effect of tension on gene expression in regenerating nerves has not been characterized. This study investigated differential gene expression in transected nerves repaired under high and minimal tension.
Male Lewis rats underwent right sciatic nerve transection with either minimal-tension or high-tension repair. Fourteen weeks postoperatively, segments of the right sciatic nerves were harvested along with equal-length segments from the contralateral, healthy nerve to serve as internal controls (naïve nerve). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially regulated biochemical pathways between the samples were identified.
Seventeen animals were studied. The gene expression profiles of naïve nerve and minimal-tension repair demonstrated minimal within-group variation, whereas that of high-tension repair demonstrated heterogeneity. Relative to naïve nerve, high-tension repair samples had 4276 DEGs (1941 upregulated and 2335 downregulated) and minimal-tension repair samples had 3305 DEGs (1479 upregulated and 1826 downregulated). High-tension repair samples had 360 DEGs relative to minimal-tension repair samples (68 upregulated and 292 downregulated). Upregulated biological pathways in all repaired nerves included steroid biosynthesis, extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, and ferroptosis. Finally, upregulated pathways in high-tension repair samples relative to minimal-tension repair samples included tumor necrosis factor signaling, interleukin-17 signaling, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling.
The improved outcomes achieved with minimal-tension nerve repair may take root in a favorable gene expression profile. Future elucidation of biochemical pathways in nerve regeneration may identify potential therapeutic targets to optimize primary nerve repair outcomes.
尽管神经间隙修复中过度张力导致不良预后的确切机制尚未阐明,但张力对再生神经中基因表达的影响尚未得到描述。本研究调查了在高张力和低张力下修复的神经横断中差异表达的基因。
雄性 Lewis 大鼠进行右侧坐骨神经横断,分别采用低张力或高张力修复。术后 14 周,采集右侧坐骨神经节段,以及对侧健康神经等长节段作为内部对照(未损伤神经)。鉴定样本之间差异表达的基因(DEGs)和差异调控的生化途径。
共研究了 17 只动物。未损伤神经和低张力修复的基因表达谱显示组内变异较小,而高张力修复的基因表达谱显示异质性。与未损伤神经相比,高张力修复样本有 4276 个 DEGs(1941 个上调和 2335 个下调),低张力修复样本有 3305 个 DEGs(1479 个上调和 1826 个下调)。高张力修复样本相对于低张力修复样本有 360 个 DEGs(68 个上调和 292 个下调)。所有修复神经中上调的生物学途径包括类固醇生物合成、细胞外基质-受体相互作用和铁死亡。最后,高张力修复样本相对于低张力修复样本上调的途径包括肿瘤坏死因子信号、白细胞介素-17 信号、细胞因子-细胞因子受体相互作用和丝裂原激活蛋白激酶信号。
低张力神经修复获得的改善结果可能源于有利的基因表达谱。进一步阐明神经再生中的生化途径可能确定优化原发性神经修复结果的潜在治疗靶点。