Siemionow Maria, Tetik Cihangir, Ozer Kagan, Ayhan Suhan, Siemionow Krzysztof, Browne Earl
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio 44195, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2002 Mar;48(3):281-5. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200203000-00009.
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of epineural sleeve neurorrhaphy on peripheral nerve regeneration. A total of 12 Lewis rats were divided in two groups of 6 rats each. In group 1, the rat sciatic nerve was transected and repaired using the conventional epineural technique with four sutures. In group 2, the epineural sleeve technique was introduced with two sutures only. Functional recovery was evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks by walking track analysis (sciatic function index [SFI]), mean limb circumference ratio, and severity of toe contracture. Although the SFI at 12 weeks revealed no difference between the two groups (+/-88.39 +/- 10.75 conventional group, +/-77.35 +/- 17.06 epineural sleeve group), significant differences in SFIs were detected at 4 and 8 weeks, with better functional recovery in group 2 rats (4 weeks: 125.92 +/- 22.73 conventional group, +/-99.17 +/- 5.45 epineural sleeve group; 8 weeks: +/-96.65 +/- 4.73 conventional group, +/-72.82 +/- 17.11 epineural group; p < 0.05 for both time points). Mean limb circumference ratio was not significant at all time points. At 12 weeks, all animals in the conventional nerve repair group developed severe toe contractures whereas only 2 animals in epineural sleeve repair group had contracture (p < 0.05). In this study, the epineural sleeve technique demonstrated a faster functional recovery when compared with the conventional technique, as confirmed by SFI and toe contracture grading.
本研究旨在评估神经外膜套式缝合术对周围神经再生的影响。总共12只Lewis大鼠被分为两组,每组6只。在第1组中,切断大鼠坐骨神经并采用传统神经外膜技术用4针缝线进行修复。在第2组中,仅用2针缝线采用神经外膜套式技术。在第1、2、4、8和12周通过行走轨迹分析(坐骨神经功能指数[SFI])、平均肢体周径比和趾挛缩严重程度评估功能恢复情况。尽管12周时SFI显示两组之间无差异(传统组为±88.39±10.75,神经外膜套式组为±77.35±17.06),但在4周和8周时检测到SFI有显著差异,第2组大鼠功能恢复更好(4周:传统组为125.92±22.73,神经外膜套式组为±99.17±5.45;8周:传统组为±96.65±4.73,神经外膜套式组为±72.82±17.11;两个时间点p均<0.05)。所有时间点的平均肢体周径比均无显著性差异。在12周时,传统神经修复组的所有动物均出现严重的趾挛缩,而神经外膜套式修复组只有2只动物出现挛缩(p<0.05)。在本研究中,与传统技术相比,神经外膜套式技术显示出更快的功能恢复,这通过SFI和趾挛缩分级得到证实。