Suppr超能文献

被遗忘的前线工作者:环境健康服务员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间工作的观点。

Forgotten frontline workers: Environmental health service employees' perspectives on working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2022 Mar;17(3):158-168. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12781. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Environmental Health Service employees (EVS) sanitize healthcare facilities and are critical to preventing infection, but are under-resourced during the COVID-19 pandemic and at risk of burnout.

OBJECTIVE

Understand demands on EVS' work and strain on resources during COVID-19.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive study conducted in winter 2020-2021.

SETTING

One quaternary care academic medical center in Colorado.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 16 EVS out of 305 eligible at the medical center. Fifty percent identified as Black, 31% as Hispanic, 6% as Asian, and 6% as White (another 6% identified as mixed race). Sixty-nine percent were female, and half were born in a country outside the United States.

MEASURES

Semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.

RESULTS

Four themes illustrate EVS experiences with job strain and support during COVID-19: (1) Needs for ongoing training/education, (2) Emotional challenges of patient care, (3) Resource/staffing barriers, and (4) Lack of recognition as frontline responders. Despite feeling unrecognized during the pandemic, EVS identified structural supports with potential to mitigate job strain, including opportunities for increased communication with interdisciplinary colleagues, intentional acknowledgment, and education for those who speak languages other than English. Strategies that can increase physical and emotional resources and reduce job demands have potential to combat EVS burnout.

CONCLUSIONS

As the surge of COVID-19 cases continues to overwhelm healthcare facilities, healthcare systems and interdisciplinary colleagues can adopt policies and practices that ensure lower-wage healthcare workers have access to resources, education, and emotional support.

摘要

背景

环境卫生服务人员(EVS)负责清洁医疗设施,对于预防感染至关重要,但在 COVID-19 大流行期间资源不足,并且有 burnout 的风险。

目的

了解 COVID-19 期间 EVS 工作的需求和资源压力。

设计

2020-2021 年冬季进行的定性描述性研究。

地点

科罗拉多州的一家四级保健学术医疗中心。

参与者

从该医疗中心 305 名符合条件的 EVS 中抽取了 16 名进行便利抽样。其中 50%的人认为是黑人,31%的人认为是西班牙裔,6%的人认为是亚裔,6%的人认为是白人(另外 6%的人认为是混血儿)。69%的人是女性,一半人出生在国外。

措施

半结构化电话访谈。访谈进行了录音和转录,并采用主题分析法来确定关键主题。

结果

有四个主题说明了 EVS 在 COVID-19 期间的工作压力和支持体验:(1)持续培训/教育的需求,(2)患者护理的情绪挑战,(3)资源/人员配备障碍,(4)缺乏作为一线响应者的认可。尽管在大流行期间感到不受重视,但 EVS 确定了一些具有减轻工作压力潜力的结构支持,包括增加与跨学科同事沟通的机会、有意的认可以及为那些讲英语以外语言的人提供教育。增加身体和情绪资源、减少工作需求的策略有可能预防 EVS 的 burnout。

结论

随着 COVID-19 病例的激增继续使医疗设施不堪重负,医疗保健系统和跨学科同事可以采取政策和实践,确保低薪医疗工作者能够获得资源、教育和情感支持。

相似文献

3
Frontline healthcare workers experiences and challenges with in-person and remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:983414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.983414. eCollection 2022.
4
Frontline, Essential, and Invisible: The Needs of Low-Wage Workers in Hospital Settings During COVID-19.
Workplace Health Saf. 2022 Nov;70(11):509-514. doi: 10.1177/21650799221108490. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
5
The experiences of pharmacists during the global COVID-19 pandemic: A thematic analysis using the jobs demands-resources framework.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Sep;18(9):3649-3655. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Providers' perspectives on implementing resilience coaching for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 14;22(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08131-x.
8
Use of the job demands-resource model to understand community pharmacists' burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Sep;18(9):3568-3579. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Clinical Connectedness Among Hospital Environmental Service Workers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453775. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53775.
2
Infection precaution adherence varies by potential exposure risks to SARS-CoV-2 and job role: Findings from a US medical center.
Am J Infect Control. 2024 Apr;52(4):381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.10.010. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Experiences of environmental services workers in a tertiary hospital in Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;11:1178054. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178054. eCollection 2023.
4
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Black and Hispanic Americans' Work Outcomes: a Scoping Review.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun;11(3):1157-1172. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01594-6. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
5
Frontline healthcare workers' perspectives on interprofessional teamwork during COVID-19.
J Interprof Educ Pract. 2022 Dec;29:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100550. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Keepers of the House: A documentary.
Clin Teach. 2022 Feb;19(1):36-41. doi: 10.1111/tct.13439. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
2
Experiences of Home Health Care Workers in New York City During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis.
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1453-1459. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3930.
3
Investing in Our First Line of Defense: Environmental Services Workers.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):306-307. doi: 10.7326/M20-2237. Epub 2020 May 1.
5
Supporting the Health Care Workforce During the COVID-19 Global Epidemic.
JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1439-1440. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3972.
7
Low-Wage Workers and Health Benefits Use: Are We Missing an Opportunity?
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Dec;21(6):435-437. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0191. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding environmental cleaning among environmental service workers in Chinese hospitals.
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Sep 1;45(9):1043-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review.
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Feb;40(1):23-42. doi: 10.1002/nur.21768. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
10
Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research.
HERD. 2016 Jul;9(4):16-25. doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验