Kim Hyejin, Sefcik Justine S, Bradway Christine
Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104.
Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Feb;40(1):23-42. doi: 10.1002/nur.21768. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
Qualitative description (QD) is a term that is widely used to describe qualitative studies of health care and nursing-related phenomena. However, limited discussions regarding QD are found in the existing literature. In this systematic review, we identified characteristics of methods and findings reported in research articles published in 2014 whose authors identified the work as QD. After searching and screening, data were extracted from the sample of 55 QD articles and examined to characterize research objectives, design justification, theoretical/philosophical frameworks, sampling and sample size, data collection and sources, data analysis, and presentation of findings. In this review, three primary findings were identified. First, although there were some inconsistencies, most articles included characteristics consistent with the limited available QD definitions and descriptions. Next, flexibility or variability of methods was common and effective for obtaining rich data and achieving understanding of a phenomenon. Finally, justification for how a QD approach was chosen and why it would be an appropriate fit for a particular study was limited in the sample and, therefore, in need of increased attention. Based on these findings, recommendations include encouragement to researchers to provide as many details as possible regarding the methods of their QD studies so that readers can determine whether the methods used were reasonable and effective in producing useful findings. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
定性描述(QD)是一个广泛用于描述医疗保健和护理相关现象定性研究的术语。然而,现有文献中关于定性描述的讨论有限。在这项系统评价中,我们确定了2014年发表的研究文章中所报告的方法和研究结果的特征,这些文章的作者将其工作确定为定性描述。经过检索和筛选,从55篇定性描述文章的样本中提取数据,并对研究目的、设计依据、理论/哲学框架、抽样和样本量、数据收集和来源、数据分析以及研究结果的呈现进行了分析。在本评价中,确定了三个主要研究结果。首先,尽管存在一些不一致之处,但大多数文章包含的特征与有限的可用定性描述定义和描述一致。其次,方法的灵活性或可变性很常见,并且对于获取丰富数据和理解现象很有效。最后,在样本中,选择定性描述方法的理由以及为什么它适合特定研究的原因有限,因此需要更多关注。基于这些发现,建议鼓励研究人员尽可能详细地提供其定性描述研究的方法,以便读者能够确定所使用的方法在产生有用的研究结果方面是否合理和有效。© 2016威利期刊公司