Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
The role of lymph node assessment/dissection (LND) in endometrial cancer (EC) has been debated for decades, with significant practice variation between centers. Molecular classification of EC provides prognostic information and can be accurately performed on preoperative endometrial biopsies. We assessed the association between molecular subtype and lymph node metastases (LNM) in order to determine if this tool could be used to stratify surgical decision making.
All EC patients undergoing primary staging surgery with planned complete pelvic +/- para-aortic LND from a single institution in the 2015 calendar year were identified, with clinicopathological and outcome data assessed in the context of retrospectively assigned molecular classification.
172 patients were included. Molecular classification of the total cohort showed 21 POLEmut (12.2%), 47 MMRd (27.3%), 74 NSMP (43.1%), and 30 p53abn (17.4%) ECs. Complete pelvic +/- para-aortic LND was performed in 171 of 172 patients, and LNM were found in 31/171 (18.1%). This included macrometastases (19/31), micrometastases (5/31), and isolated tumour cells (ITCs) (7/31). LNM were pelvic only in 83.9%, and pelvic plus para-aortic in 16.1%. There were no isolated para-aortic LNM. Molecular subtype was significantly associated with LNM (p = 0.004). There was a strong association between the presence of LNM and p53abn EC (nodal involvement in 44.8% of cases), with LNM detected in 14.2% of POLEmut, 14.9% of MMRd, and 10.8% of NSMP EC. On multivariate analysis, molecular subtype and preoperative CA 125 > 25 were significantly associated with LNM (p = 0.021 and p = 0.022 respectively) but preoperative grade and histotype were not (p = 0.24).
EC molecular subtype is significantly associated with the presence of LNM. As molecular classification can be obtained on preoperative diagnostic specimens, this information can be used to guide surgical treatment planning and may reduce the cost and morbidity of unnecessary lymph node staging in EC care.
几十年来,淋巴结评估/切除(LND)在子宫内膜癌(EC)中的作用一直存在争议,中心之间的实践差异很大。EC 的分子分类提供了预后信息,并且可以在术前子宫内膜活检上准确进行。我们评估了分子亚型与淋巴结转移(LNM)之间的关系,以确定该工具是否可用于分层手术决策。
我们从一家机构在 2015 年的日历年内对所有接受原发性分期手术且计划进行完整盆腔 +/- 腹主动脉旁 LND 的 EC 患者进行了识别,并在回顾性分配的分子分类的背景下评估了临床病理和结局数据。
共纳入 172 例患者。整个队列的分子分类显示 21 例 POLEmut(12.2%)、47 例 MMRd(27.3%)、74 例 NSMP(43.1%)和 30 例 p53abn(17.4%)EC。172 例患者中有 171 例行完整盆腔 +/- 腹主动脉旁 LND,171 例中有 31 例发现 LNM(18.1%)。这包括巨转移(19/31)、微转移(5/31)和孤立肿瘤细胞(ITC)(7/31)。LNM 仅在盆腔的占 83.9%,盆腔加腹主动脉旁的占 16.1%。没有孤立的腹主动脉旁 LNM。分子亚型与 LNM 显著相关(p=0.004)。LNM 与 p53abn EC 之间存在很强的关联(病例中有 44.8%存在淋巴结受累),在 POLEmut、MMRd 和 NSMP EC 中分别检测到 14.2%、14.9%和 10.8%的 LNM。多变量分析显示,分子亚型和术前 CA125>25 与 LNM 显著相关(p=0.021 和 p=0.022),但术前分级和组织类型没有(p=0.24)。
EC 的分子亚型与 LNM 的存在显著相关。由于分子分类可在术前诊断标本上获得,因此该信息可用于指导手术治疗计划,并可能降低 EC 护理中不必要的淋巴结分期的成本和发病率。