Suppr超能文献

2017 年北卡罗来纳州过度饮酒的社会成本。

The Societal Cost of Excessive Drinking in North Carolina, 2017.

机构信息

Graduate research assistant and PhD student in epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Research scientist, Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina and Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina.

出版信息

N C Med J. 2022 May-Jun;83(3):214-220. doi: 10.18043/ncm.83.3.214.

Abstract

Excessive drinking, including binge and heavy drinking, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in North Carolina. In 2010, excessive drinking cost North Carolina $7.03 billion, and this analysis aimed to update this figure for 2017. Following the methods of Sacks, et al. (2015), we obtained proxies for the 2010 and 2017 incidence and price for 26 alcohol-attributable cost components. We then multiplied each component's 2010 cost by the incidence trend (2017 incidence/2010 incidence) and price trend (2017 price/2010 price) to estimate the 2017 cost. Finally, we summed these cost components to calculate the total cost and allocated them by payer and county. Excessive drinking cost $9.72 billion in North Carolina in 2017, which equals approximately $2.09 per standard drink. Government paid $4.43 billion (45.6%), drinkers paid $3.76 billion (38.7%), and persons other than the drinker paid $1.53 billion (15.7%). These methods relied on alcohol-attributable fractions, which were calculated using scientific literature and national data. If consumption patterns differ between the United States and North Carolina, these fractions may not generalize. Scaling processes may over- or underestimate individual cost components, so total state costs should be interpreted as estimates. The societal costs from excessive drinking are high but spread across public sectors. This can make it difficult to attribute this burden to alcohol. While drinkers paid less than half of the costs of excessive drinking, a broad range of stakeholders bore the burden. Evidence-based strategies to reduce excessive drinking may decrease these costs.

摘要

过量饮酒,包括狂饮和重度饮酒,是北卡罗来纳州发病率和死亡率的主要原因。2010 年,过量饮酒使北卡罗来纳州损失 70.3 亿美元,本分析旨在更新 2017 年的这一数字。我们采用 Sacks 等人(2015 年)的方法,获得了 2010 年和 2017 年 26 个与酒精相关的成本组成部分的发病率和价格的替代指标。然后,我们将每个组成部分的 2010 年成本乘以发病率趋势(2017 年发病率/2010 年发病率)和价格趋势(2017 年价格/2010 年价格),以估算 2017 年的成本。最后,我们将这些成本组成部分相加,计算出总成本,并按支付方和县进行分配。2017 年,北卡罗来纳州的过量饮酒成本为 97.2 亿美元,相当于每标准饮品约 2.09 美元。政府支付了 44.3 亿美元(45.6%),饮酒者支付了 37.6 亿美元(38.7%),非饮酒者支付了 15.3 亿美元(15.7%)。这些方法依赖于酒精归因分数,这些分数是使用科学文献和国家数据计算得出的。如果美国和北卡罗来纳州的消费模式不同,这些分数可能无法推广。缩放过程可能会高估或低估个别成本组成部分,因此州总成本应被视为估计值。过量饮酒造成的社会成本很高,但分布在公共部门。这使得难以将这一负担归咎于酒精。尽管饮酒者仅支付了过量饮酒成本的不到一半,但广泛的利益相关者承担了这一负担。减少过量饮酒的循证策略可能会降低这些成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验