Suppr超能文献

乌干达世界卫生组织基本急救课程的课前在线案例:一项混合方法分析

Pre-course online cases for the world health organization's basic emergency care course in Uganda: A mixed methods analysis.

作者信息

Friedman Alexandra, Wallis Lee A, Bullick Julia C, Cunningham Charmaine, Kalanzi Joseph, Kavuma Peter, Osiro Martha, Straube Steven, Tenner Andrea G

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Bellville, South Africa.

出版信息

Afr J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;12(2):148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Ministry of Health - Uganda implemented the World Health Organization's Basic Emergency Care course (BEC) to improve formal emergency care training and address its high burden of acute illness and injury. The BEC is an open-access, in-person, short course that provides comprehensive basic emergency training in low-resource settings. A free, open-access series of pre-course online cases available as downloadable offline files were developed to improve knowledge acquisition and retention. We evaluated BEC participants' knowledge and self-efficacy in emergency care provision with and without these cases and their perceptions of the cases.

METHODS

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) and Likert-scale surveys assessed 137 providers' knowledge and self-efficacy in emergency care provision, respectively, and focus group discussions explored 74 providers' perceptions of the BEC course with cases in Kampala in this prospective, controlled study. Data was collected pre-BEC, post-BEC and six-months post-BEC. We used liability analysis and Cronbach alpha coefficients to establish intercorrelation between categorised Likert-scale items. We used mixed model analysis of variance to interpret Likert-scale and MCQ data and thematic content analysis to explore focus group discussions.

RESULTS

Participants gained and maintained significant increases in MCQ averages (15%) and Likert-scale scores over time (p < 0.001). The intervention group scored significantly higher on the pre-test MCQ than controls (p = 0.004) and insignificantly higher at all other times (p > 0.05). Nurses experienced more significant initial gains and long-term decays in MCQ and self-efficacy than doctors (p = 0.009, p < 0.05). Providers found the cases most useful pre-BEC to preview course content but did not revisit them post-course. Technological difficulties and internet costs limited case usage.

CONCLUSION

Basic emergency care courses for low-resource settings can increase frontline providers' long-term knowledge and self-efficacy in emergency care. Nurses experienced greater initial gains and long-term losses in knowledge than doctors. Online adjuncts may enhance health professional education in low-to-middle income countries.

摘要

引言

乌干达卫生部实施了世界卫生组织的基础急救课程(BEC),以改善正规急救培训,并应对该国急性疾病和损伤的高负担问题。BEC是一门开放获取的面授短期课程,在资源匮乏地区提供全面的基础急救培训。还开发了一系列免费的、开放获取的课前在线病例,可作为离线文件下载,以提高知识获取和留存率。我们评估了有这些病例和没有这些病例时BEC参与者在急救提供方面的知识和自我效能,以及他们对这些病例的看法。

方法

在这项前瞻性对照研究中,通过多项选择题(MCQ)和李克特量表调查分别评估了137名提供者在急救提供方面的知识和自我效能,并通过焦点小组讨论探讨了74名提供者对坎帕拉有病例的BEC课程的看法。在BEC前、BEC后和BEC后六个月收集数据。我们使用可靠性分析和克朗巴哈α系数来确定分类李克特量表项目之间的相互关系。我们使用混合模型方差分析来解释李克特量表和MCQ数据,并使用主题内容分析来探索焦点小组讨论。

结果

随着时间的推移,参与者的MCQ平均分(15%)和李克特量表得分显著提高并保持(p < 0.001)。干预组在预测试MCQ上的得分显著高于对照组(p = 0.),在所有其他时间得分略高但不显著(p > 0.05)。与医生相比,护士在MCQ和自我效能方面的初始收益更显著,但长期下降更明显(p = 0.009,p < 0.05)。提供者发现这些病例在BEC前最有助于预习课程内容,但课程结束后没有再查看。技术困难和互联网成本限制了病例的使用。

结论

针对资源匮乏地区的基础急救课程可以提高一线提供者在急救方面的长期知识和自我效能。与医生相比,护士在知识方面的初始收益更大,但长期损失更大。在线辅助工具可能会加强中低收入国家的卫生专业教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0be7/9048077/732222a854cd/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验