Cumpstey Andrew F, Oldman Alex H, Martin Daniel S, Smith Andrew, Grocott Michael P W
Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton / University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 25;4(4):e0652. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000652. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best clinical outcomes for these patients. This review aims to determine whether higher or lower oxygenation targets are beneficial for mechanically ventilated adult patients.
Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Cochrane medical databases were searched from inception through to February 28, 2021.
Randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower oxygen targets in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in an intensive care setting.
Study setting, participant type, participant numbers, and intervention targets were captured. Outcome measures included "mortality at longest follow-up" (primary), mechanical ventilator duration and free days, vasopressor-free days, patients on renal replacement therapy, renal replacement free days, cost benefit, and quality of life scores. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects models was used. Post hoc subgroup analysis looked separately at studies comparing hypoxemia versus normoxemia and normoxemia versus hyperoxemia.
Data from eight trials (4,415 participants) were analyzed. Comparing higher and lower oxygen targets, there was no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), but heterogeneous and overlapping target ranges limit the validity and clinical relevance of this finding. Data from seven studies ( = 4,245) demonstrated targeting normoxemia compared with hyperoxemia may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (0.73 [0.57-0.95]) but this estimate had very low certainty. There was no difference in mortality between targeting relative hypoxemia or normoxemia (1.20 [0.83-1.73]).
This systematic review and meta-analysis identified possible increased mortality with liberal oxygen targeting strategies and no difference in morbidity between high or low oxygen targets in mechanically ventilated adults. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity in study methodology and further research is urgently required to define optimal oxygen therapy targets.
入住重症监护病房的患者通常需要接受有创机械通气和高浓度氧气治疗。机械通气可导致急性肺损伤,而氧疗可能会使其加重。对于这些患者,哪种氧疗目标能带来最佳临床结果仍不确定。本综述旨在确定较高或较低的氧合目标对接受机械通气的成年患者是否有益。
检索了医学文摘数据库(Excerpta Medica dataBASE)、医学文献分析和检索系统在线数据库(Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online)以及Cochrane医学数据库,检索时间从建库至2021年2月28日。
比较在重症监护环境中通过气管插管或气管切开接受有创机械通气的成年患者中较高和较低氧目标的随机对照试验。
记录研究背景、参与者类型、参与者数量和干预目标。结局指标包括“最长随访期的死亡率”(主要指标)、机械通气持续时间和无机械通气天数、无血管活性药物天数、接受肾脏替代治疗的患者、无肾脏替代治疗天数、成本效益和生活质量评分。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)以及Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估证据确定性和偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型。事后亚组分析分别观察了比较低氧血症与正常氧血症以及正常氧血症与高氧血症的研究。
分析了八项试验(4415名参与者)的数据。比较较高和较低氧目标时,死亡率无差异(优势比,0.95;95%置信区间,0.74 - 1.22),但目标范围的异质性和重叠性限制了这一发现的有效性和临床相关性。七项研究(n = 4245)的数据表明,与高氧血症相比,以正常氧血症为目标可能会降低最长随访期的死亡率(0.73 [0.57 - 0.95]),但这一估计的确定性非常低。以相对低氧血症或正常氧血症为目标时死亡率无差异(1.20 [0.83 - 1.73])。
本系统评价和荟萃分析发现,宽松的氧目标策略可能会增加死亡率,在接受机械通气的成年人中,高氧目标和低氧目标在发病率方面无差异。研究结果受到研究方法学中大量异质性的限制,迫切需要进一步研究来确定最佳氧疗目标。