Singh Raja
Department of Architecture, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, IND.
ISAC Centre for Built Environment Policy, Information Sharing and Analysis Center, Delhi, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e23748. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23748. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Background Airports are hubs of diverse human interactions. During pandemics, they may serve as centers for the spread of airborne infection. Appropriate methods for the prevention of the spread of airborne infections must be integrated into the air conditioning systems of airports. Along with ultraviolet germicidal irradiation and other sanitization methods, dilution ventilation can be the easiest and most available method for the prevention of airborne infection, which means the intake of outside air into the indoors, which flushes out the aerosolized droplets containing pathogens. Though this process has been adopted by multiple buildings in reaction to the pandemic, it may present the challenge of intake of high concentration of suspended particulate matter in the intake air, a major air pollutant in developing countries, which may enter through the air conditioning systems. Appropriate filtration is necessary so that along with dilution ventilation for airborne disease prevention, the risk of suspended particulate matter of diameter 2.5 micron or PM induced lung issues is also reduced. Methodology The Right to Information Act, 2005, was used to file applications for information on the details of the air conditioning systems in Indian airports. The 58 airports in the study were also listed according to the list of cities that fall under the criteria for non-attainment of good air quality standards. Results Out of 58 airports considered, 27 fell in the 'non-attainment' of good air quality list. On appraisal of filter systems, it was found that 23 had an intake of fresh air but only five had filters with a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 10 and above in their air conditioning systems, as is recommended for filtration of suspended particulate matter. Conclusion It can be concluded that most airports did not have the appropriate filter required for filtering PM, which is a major pollutant in Indian cities. In light of coronavirus disease 2019, where dilution ventilation through the intake of outdoor air is suggested, it may also lead to the entry of air with high particulate matter into the indoors.
背景 机场是各种人际互动的枢纽。在疫情期间,它们可能成为空气传播感染的传播中心。预防空气传播感染扩散的适当方法必须融入机场的空调系统。除了紫外线杀菌照射和其他消毒方法外,稀释通风可能是预防空气传播感染最简单且最可行的方法,这意味着将室外空气引入室内,以冲走含有病原体的气溶胶飞沫。尽管这一过程已被多栋建筑在应对疫情时采用,但它可能带来挑战,即进气中含有高浓度悬浮颗粒物,这是发展中国家的一种主要空气污染物,可能通过空调系统进入室内。因此需要进行适当的过滤,以便在通过稀释通风预防空气传播疾病的同时,降低直径2.5微米的悬浮颗粒物或细颗粒物引发肺部问题的风险。
方法 使用2005年的《信息权法》提交申请,获取印度机场空调系统详细信息。研究中的58个机场也根据未达到良好空气质量标准的城市名单进行了列出。
结果 在考虑的58个机场中,有27个属于空气质量“未达标”名单。在对过滤系统进行评估时发现,23个机场有新鲜空气 intake,但在其空调系统中,只有5个机场的过滤器最低效率报告值(MERV)达到10及以上,而这是过滤悬浮颗粒物所推荐的。
结论 可以得出结论,大多数机场没有过滤细颗粒物所需的适当过滤器,而细颗粒物是印度城市的主要污染物。鉴于2019年冠状病毒病,建议通过引入室外空气进行稀释通风,这也可能导致高颗粒物空气进入室内。 (注:原文中“intake”翻译为“进气”,这里“新鲜空气intake”不太准确,可根据上下文进一步优化表述,但按要求不添加其他解释,保留原文表述形式。)