Kumaar Arun, Shanthappa Arun H, Ethiraj Prabhu
Department of Orthopedics, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e23727. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23727. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Orthopedic surgeons face a difficult task in treating serious open fractures, which usually result in complications, morbidity, and even amputation. Compound fracture wounds were traditionally treated with a standard saline dressing. To avoid infection and problems during therapy, several studies found that open fractures require early skeletal stability as well as soft tissue repair. In favoring the above fact vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is now undergoing a paradigm shift. With this background, this study aimed to compare the effects of VAC dressing versus standard wound dressing on compound fracture wounds.
This study has been conducted as a single-blind randomized control trial among 128 patients who got admitted to the Department of Orthopedics, R L Jalappa Hospital attached to Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Karnataka, India from August 2019 to November 2021. The study participants were randomly allotted into two groups negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and standard wound therapy (SWT) consisting of 64 participants in each group. VAC dressing was used on group NPWT, while normal saline wound dressing was used on group SWT. Both groups were followed up for a month after their discharge from the hospital. Frequency in dressing changes wound healing time, infection presence, and hospitalization days were all recorded and compared over one month. The data collection was done using questionnaires and the statistical analysis was done with SPSS version 21 (Chicago, IL: IBM Corp.).
There was a statically significant difference favoring group NPWT compared to group SWT with a hospital stay, number of dressings required, wound size reduction, wound healing time, and deep infection rate (p<0.05).
The use of NPWT speeds up the healing of compound fracture wounds significantly. It is affordable and can be used as a substitute in resource-constrained areas to reduce infection and manage open fracture wounds quickly.
骨科医生在治疗严重开放性骨折时面临艰巨任务,此类骨折通常会导致并发症、致残,甚至截肢。复合骨折伤口传统上采用标准盐水敷料治疗。为避免治疗期间的感染和问题,多项研究发现开放性骨折需要早期骨骼稳定以及软组织修复。基于上述事实,负压封闭引流(VAC)目前正在经历模式转变。在此背景下,本研究旨在比较VAC敷料与标准伤口敷料对复合骨折伤口的效果。
本研究作为一项单盲随机对照试验,在2019年8月至2021年11月期间入住印度卡纳塔克邦斯里德瓦拉杰乌尔医学院附属RL贾拉帕医院骨科的128例患者中进行。研究参与者被随机分为两组,负压伤口治疗(NPWT)组和标准伤口治疗(SWT)组,每组64人。NPWT组使用VAC敷料,而SWT组使用生理盐水伤口敷料。两组患者出院后均随访一个月。记录并比较一个月内换药频率、伤口愈合时间、感染情况和住院天数。使用问卷进行数据收集,并使用SPSS 21版(伊利诺伊州芝加哥:IBM公司)进行统计分析。
与SWT组相比,NPWT组在住院时间、所需敷料数量、伤口大小缩小、伤口愈合时间和深部感染率方面存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。
使用NPWT可显著加速复合骨折伤口的愈合。它价格实惠,可在资源有限地区用作替代品,以减少感染并快速处理开放性骨折伤口。