• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Attachment Style 与美国新兵自杀企图风险的关系。

Attachment Style and Risk of Suicide Attempt Among New Soldiers in the U.S. Army.

出版信息

Psychiatry. 2022 Winter;85(4):387-398. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2022.2062661. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1080/00332747.2022.2062661
PMID:35511577
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Among U.S. Army soldiers suicide attempts (SAs) are a significant public health concern, particularly early in service. We examined the association of attachment style with SA and suicide ideation (SI) among U.S. Army soldiers.

METHODS

We analyzed survey data from new soldiers who participated in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). The sample consists of 38,507 soldiers entering Basic Combat Training (BCT) between April 2011 and November 2012. Attachment style (secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing) was assessed using items from the Relationship Questionnaire. Lifetime (pre-enlistment) SA and SI were assessed with a modified Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Logistic regression analyses examined associations of attachment style with lifetime SA, SI, and attempts among ideators, after adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

The secure attachment style was associated with lower odds of SA (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.63-0.92), whereas preoccupied (OR = 4.63, 95% CI = 3.83-5.61), fearful (OR = 4.08, 95% CI = 3.38-4.94), or dismissing (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.24-1.96) attachment styles were associated with higher odds of SA. Similar results were found for SI. Importantly, both preoccupied (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.37-2.04) and fearful (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.38-2.08) attachment were associated with attempts among ideators.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the clinical importance of attachment style in predicting suicidal behavior and as possible targets for intervention. A critical next step is for prospective research to examine whether attachment style predicts future suicidal behavior.

摘要

目的

在美国陆军士兵中,自杀企图(SA)是一个严重的公共卫生问题,尤其是在服役早期。我们研究了依恋风格与美国陆军士兵自杀意念(SI)和自杀企图的关系。

方法

我们分析了参加陆军士兵风险和适应力研究(Army STARRS)的新兵的调查数据。该样本由 2011 年 4 月至 2012 年 11 月期间参加基础战斗训练(BCT)的 38507 名士兵组成。使用关系问卷中的项目评估依恋风格(安全型、专注型、恐惧型和回避型)。使用改良的哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表评估终身(入伍前)SA 和 SI。在调整了社会人口统计学特征后,使用逻辑回归分析来研究依恋风格与终生 SA、SI 以及有自杀意念者尝试自杀之间的关系。

结果

安全型依恋风格与较低的自杀企图几率相关(OR=0.76,95%CI=0.63-0.92),而专注型(OR=4.63,95%CI=3.83-5.61)、恐惧型(OR=4.08,95%CI=3.38-4.94)或回避型(OR=1.56,95%CI=1.24-1.96)依恋风格与较高的自杀企图几率相关。对于 SI 也有类似的结果。重要的是,专注型(OR=1.67,95%CI=1.37-2.04)和恐惧型(OR=1.70,95%CI=1.38-2.08)依恋均与有自杀意念者的尝试自杀有关。

结论

这些发现强调了依恋风格在预测自杀行为方面的临床重要性,以及它可能成为干预的目标。下一步是进行前瞻性研究,以检验依恋风格是否预测未来的自杀行为。

相似文献

1
Attachment Style and Risk of Suicide Attempt Among New Soldiers in the U.S. Army. Attachment Style 与美国新兵自杀企图风险的关系。
Psychiatry. 2022 Winter;85(4):387-398. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2022.2062661. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Attachment Style, Social Support Network, and Lifetime Suicide Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among New Soldiers in the U.S. Army. Attachment Style、社会支持网络与美国新兵的终生自杀意念和自杀企图。
Psychiatry. 2024 Fall;87(3):251-263. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2024.2364525. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Prospective association of attachment style with suicide attempts among US Army soldiers.美国陆军士兵依恋风格与自杀未遂之间的前瞻性关联。
Psychol Med. 2024 Mar;54(4):785-793. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002489. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
4
Transition to suicide attempt from recent suicide ideation in U.S. Army soldiers: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).美国陆军士兵近期自杀意念向自杀企图的转变:来自军人风险与韧性评估研究(Army STARRS)的结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 May;36(5):412-422. doi: 10.1002/da.22870. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
Predictors of suicide attempt within 30 days of first medically documented major depression diagnosis in U.S. army soldiers with no prior suicidal ideation.预测美国军队中首次有医学记录的重度抑郁症诊断后 30 天内无自杀意念的士兵自杀企图的因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 2;23(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04872-z.
6
The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS).美国陆军军人风险与恢复力评估研究(陆军STARRS)
Psychiatry. 2014 Summer;77(2):107-19. doi: 10.1521/psyc.2014.77.2.107.
7
Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among soldiers: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).军人自杀行为的流行率及其相关因素:来自军人风险与适应研究(Army STARRS)的结果。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):514-22. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.30.
8
Assessment of a Risk Index for Suicide Attempts Among US Army Soldiers With Suicide Ideation: Analysis of Data From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).评估有自杀意念的美国陆军士兵自杀企图风险指数:来自军人风险和复原力研究(军人 STARRS)的数据分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0766.
9
Childhood Maltreatment and Lifetime Suicidal Behaviors Among New Soldiers in the US Army: Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).美国陆军新兵童年期虐待与终生自杀行为:军人风险与韧性评估研究(Army STARRS)的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Mar/Apr;79(2). doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10900.
10
Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among new soldiers in the U.S. Army: results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).美国陆军新兵自杀行为的患病率及其相关因素:来自军人风险与恢复力评估陆军研究(陆军STARRS)的结果
Depress Anxiety. 2015 Jan;32(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/da.22317. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Polygenic risk for suicide attempt is associated with lifetime suicide attempt in US soldiers independent of parental risk.自杀未遂的多基因风险与美国士兵的终生自杀未遂有关,与父母的风险无关。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 15;351:671-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.254. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Prospective association of attachment style with suicide attempts among US Army soldiers.美国陆军士兵依恋风格与自杀未遂之间的前瞻性关联。
Psychol Med. 2024 Mar;54(4):785-793. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002489. Epub 2023 Aug 31.