Suppr超能文献

基于脚踝和手腕活动记录仪对住院老年患者睡眠时长和觉醒次数的评估

Assessment of Sleep Duration and Number of Awakenings Based on Ankle and Wrist Actigraphy in Medical Hospitalized Older Patients.

作者信息

Smichenko Juliana, Shochat Tamar, Zisberg Anna

机构信息

The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Science, 61196University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Clalit Health Services, Carmel Hospital, Israel.

出版信息

Biol Res Nurs. 2022 Oct;24(4):448-458. doi: 10.1177/10998004221095567. Epub 2022 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies performed in the hospital assess sleep using self-reports; few rely on actigraphy. Although wrist actigraphy is commonly used for sleep assessment in field studies, in-hospital assessment may be challenging and cumbersome because other more necessary monitoring devices are often attached to patients' upper limbs; these may affect interpretation of wrist activity data. Placement on the ankle may be a viable solution.

OBJECTIVE

To compare total sleep time (TST) and number of awakenings (NOA) using concomitant wrist and ankle actigraphy, as well as self-reports in a sample of older adult patients hospitalized in medical units.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. Objective sleep data were collected using ankle and wrist actigraphy, and subjective data using sleep diary. Repeated measures mixed model analysis was performed, adjusting for age, gender, sleep medications, symptoms severity, interaction between types of measure, and night number.

RESULTS

Twenty-one older adults (65+) wore ankle and wrist actigraphy devices and subjectively estimated sleep parameters for an average of (2.15 ± 1.01) nights, with 40 nights available for analysis. TST was lower for wrist than ankle actigraphy ( = 7.92, = .0007). Neither differed from self-reports. NOA differed between all types of measure (ankle, 8.58 ± 6.66; wrist, 15.49 ± 7.47; self-report, 1.81 ± 1.83; = 47.66, < .001). No significant within-subject variations and no interaction between devices and repeated measures were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences between ankle and wrist assessments, all three methods provided consistent TST estimation within participants. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of ankle actigraphy for sleep assessment in hospital settings.

摘要

背景

大多数在医院进行的研究使用自我报告来评估睡眠;很少有研究依赖于活动记录仪。虽然手腕活动记录仪在现场研究中常用于睡眠评估,但在医院环境中进行评估可能具有挑战性且麻烦,因为其他更必要的监测设备通常连接在患者的上肢;这些可能会影响对手腕活动数据的解读。放置在脚踝上可能是一个可行的解决方案。

目的

在一个内科病房住院的老年患者样本中,比较使用手腕和脚踝同步活动记录仪以及自我报告得出的总睡眠时间(TST)和觉醒次数(NOA)。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察研究。使用脚踝和手腕活动记录仪收集客观睡眠数据,使用睡眠日记收集主观数据。进行重复测量混合模型分析,并对年龄、性别、睡眠药物、症状严重程度、测量类型之间的相互作用以及夜晚数量进行调整。

结果

21名65岁及以上的老年人佩戴脚踝和手腕活动记录仪设备,并主观估计睡眠参数,平均时长为(2.15±1.01)晚,共有40个夜晚的数据可供分析。手腕活动记录仪测得的TST低于脚踝活动记录仪( = 7.92, = 0.0007)。两者与自我报告均无差异。所有测量类型之间的NOA存在差异(脚踝,8.58±6.66;手腕,15.49±7.47;自我报告,1.81±1.83; = 47.66, < 0.001)。未发现显著的受试者内差异,也未发现设备与重复测量之间的相互作用。

结论

尽管脚踝和手腕评估之间存在差异,但所有三种方法在参与者中提供了一致的TST估计。研究结果为在医院环境中使用脚踝活动记录仪进行睡眠评估提供了初步支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验