Suppr超能文献

荟萃分析:缓解期青少年和青年抑郁与焦虑的复发预防策略

Meta-Analysis: Relapse Prevention Strategies for Depression and Anxiety in Remitted Adolescents and Young Adults.

作者信息

Robberegt Suzanne J, Brouwer Marlies E, Kooiman Bas E A M, Stikkelbroek Yvonne A J, Nauta Maaike H, Bockting Claudi L H

机构信息

Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Depression Expertise Centre-Youth, GGZ Oost Brabant, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;62(3):306-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 May 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Depression and anxiety cause a high burden of disease and have high relapse rates (39%-72%). This meta-analysis systematically examined effectiveness of relapse prevention strategies on risk of and time to relapse in youth who remitted.

METHOD

PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, Cochrane, and ERIC databases were searched up to June 15, 2021. Eligible studies compared relapse prevention strategies to control conditions among youth (mean age 13-25 years) who were previously depressed or anxious or with ≥30% improvement in symptoms. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full texts; extracted study data; and assessed risk of bias and overall strength of evidence. Random-effects models were used to pool results, and mixed-effects models were used for subgroup analyses. Main outcome was relapse rate at last follow-up (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020149326).

RESULTS

Of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined depression, 9 were eligible for analysis: 4 included psychological interventions (n = 370), 3 included antidepressants (n = 80), and 2 included combinations (n = 132). No RCTs for anxiety were identified. Over 6 to 75 months, relapse was half as likely following psychological treatment compared with care as usual conditions (k = 6; odds ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.00). Sensitivity analyses including only studies with ≥50 participants (k = 3), showed similar results. Over 6 to 12 months, relapse was less likely in youth receiving antidepressants compared with youth receiving pill placebo (k = 3; OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.82). Quality of studies was suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

Relapse prevention strategies for youth depression reduce risk of relapse, although adequately powered, high-quality RCTs are needed. This finding, together with the lack of RCTs on anxiety, underscores the need to examine relapse prevention in youth facing these common mental health conditions.

摘要

目的

抑郁和焦虑造成了沉重的疾病负担,且复发率很高(39%-72%)。这项荟萃分析系统地研究了复发预防策略对缓解期青少年复发风险和复发时间的有效性。

方法

检索了截至2021年6月15日的PubMed、PsycInfo、Embase、Cochrane和ERIC数据库。符合条件的研究将复发预防策略与之前患有抑郁或焦虑或症状改善≥30%的青少年(平均年龄13-25岁)的对照情况进行了比较。两名评审员独立评估标题、摘要和全文;提取研究数据;并评估偏倚风险和证据的总体强度。采用随机效应模型汇总结果,采用混合效应模型进行亚组分析。主要结局是最后一次随访时的复发率(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020149326)。

结果

在10项研究抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)中,9项符合分析条件:4项包括心理干预(n = 370),3项包括抗抑郁药(n = 80),2项包括联合治疗(n = 132)。未发现针对焦虑症的RCT。在6至75个月的时间里,与常规护理相比,心理治疗后复发的可能性减半(k = 6;优势比0.56,95%CI 0.31至1.00)。仅纳入参与者≥50人的研究的敏感性分析(k = 3)显示了相似的结果。在6至12个月的时间里,与接受丸剂安慰剂的青少年相比,接受抗抑郁药治疗的青少年复发的可能性较小(k = 3;OR 0.29,95%CI 0.10至0.82)。研究质量欠佳。

结论

青少年抑郁症的复发预防策略可降低复发风险,不过仍需要有足够效力的高质量RCT。这一发现,再加上缺乏针对焦虑症的RCT,凸显了对面临这些常见心理健康状况的青少年进行复发预防研究的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验