Suppr超能文献

老年人抑郁症的延续治疗和维持治疗。

Continuation and maintenance treatments for depression in older people.

作者信息

Wilkinson Philip, Izmeth Zehanah

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Headington, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD006727. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006727.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depressive illness in older people causes significant suffering and health service utilisation. Relapse and recurrence rates are high.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in preventing the relapse and recurrence of depression in older people.

SEARCH METHODS

Search of the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's specialized register (the CCDANCTR) up to 22 June 2012. The CCDANCTR includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE, (1974 to date) MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). We handsearched relevant journals, contacted experts in the field and examined reference lists, conference proceedings and bibliographies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Both review authors independently selected studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving people aged 60 and over successfully treated for an episode of depression and randomised to receive continuation and maintenance treatment with antidepressants, psychological therapies, or combination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by the two authors.The primary outcome was relapse/recurrence rate of depression (reaching a cut-off on any depression rating scale) at six-monthly intervals. Secondary outcomes included global impression of change, social functioning, and deaths. Meta-analysis was performed using risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria (803 participants). Six compared antidepressant medication with placebo; two involved psychological therapies. There was marked heterogeneity between the studies.Comparing antidepressants with placebo, at six months follow-up there was no significant difference. At 12 months follow-up there was a statistically significant difference favouring antidepressants in reducing recurrence compared with placebo (three RCTs, N = 247, RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82; NNTB = five). At 24 months there was no significant difference for antidepressants overall, however, for the subgroup of tricyclic antidepressants there was significant benefit (three RCTs, N = 169, RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99; NNTB = five). At 36 months there was no significant difference for antidepressants overall. There was no difference in treatment acceptability or death rates between antidepressant and placebo.There was no significant difference between psychological treatment and antidepressant in recurrence rates at 12, 24, and 36 months (one RCT, N = 53) or between combination and antidepressant alone.Overall, the included studies were at low risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The long-term benefits of continuing antidepressant medication in the prevention of recurrence of depression in older people are not clear and no firm treatment recommendations can be made on the basis of this review. Continuing antidepressant medication for 12 months appears to be helpful but this is based on only three small studies with relatively few participants using differing classes of antidepressants in clinically heterogeneous populations. Comparisons at other time points did not reach statistical significance. Data on psychological therapies and combined treatments are too limited to draw any conclusions.

摘要

背景

老年抑郁症会导致巨大痛苦并增加医疗服务的使用。复发率和再发率都很高。

目的

研究抗抑郁药和心理治疗在预防老年人抑郁症复发方面的疗效。

检索方法

检索截至2012年6月22日的Cochrane抑郁、焦虑和神经症综述小组的专业注册库(CCDANCTR)。CCDANCTR包括来自以下书目数据库的相关随机对照试验:Cochrane图书馆(所有年份)、EMBASE(1974年至今)、MEDLINE(1950年至今)和PsycINFO(1967年至今)。我们手工检索了相关期刊,联系了该领域的专家,并查阅了参考文献列表、会议记录和书目。

选择标准

两位综述作者独立选择研究。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),试验对象为60岁及以上曾成功治疗过一次抑郁症发作且被随机分配接受抗抑郁药、心理治疗或联合治疗进行巩固和维持治疗的人群。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立提取数据。主要结局是每隔六个月抑郁症的复发/再发率(在任何抑郁症评定量表上达到临界值)。次要结局包括总体变化印象、社会功能和死亡情况。采用风险比分析二分结局,采用均数差(MD)分析连续结局,并给出95%置信区间进行荟萃分析。

主要结果

七项研究符合纳入标准(803名参与者)。六项研究比较了抗抑郁药物与安慰剂;两项涉及心理治疗。各研究之间存在明显的异质性。将抗抑郁药与安慰剂进行比较,在六个月随访时无显著差异。在十二个月随访时,与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药在降低复发率方面有统计学显著差异(三项RCT,N = 247,RR = 0.67,95%CI 0.55至0.82;需治疗人数减少 = 5)。在二十四个月时,抗抑郁药总体上无显著差异,然而,三环类抗抑郁药亚组有显著益处(三项RCT,N = 169,RR = 0.70,95%CI 0.50至0.99;需治疗人数减少 = 5)。在三十六个月时抗抑郁药总体上无显著差异。抗抑郁药与安慰剂在治疗可接受性或死亡率方面无差异。在十二个月、二十四个月和三十六个月时,心理治疗与抗抑郁药在复发率上无显著差异(一项RCT,N = 53),联合治疗与单纯抗抑郁药之间也无显著差异。总体而言,纳入的研究偏倚风险较低。

作者结论

在预防老年人抑郁症复发方面,持续使用抗抑郁药物的长期益处尚不清楚,基于本综述无法给出确切的治疗建议。持续使用抗抑郁药物十二个月似乎有帮助,但这仅基于三项规模较小、参与者相对较少、在临床异质性人群中使用不同类抗抑郁药的研究。在其他时间点的比较未达到统计学显著性。关于心理治疗和联合治疗的数据过于有限,无法得出任何结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验