Rozenfeld Michael, Peleg Kobi, Radomislensky Irina, Ragoler Morel, Bodas Moran
Israel National Center for Trauma and Emergency Medicine Research, Gertner Institute, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 May 6;17:e154. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.118.
To compare injury patterns of different types of explosions.
A retrospective study of 4508 patients hospitalized due to explosions recorded in the Israel National Trauma Registry between January 1997 and December 2018. The events were divided into 4 groups: terror-related, war-related, civilian intentional explosions, and civilian unintentional explosions. The groups were compared in terms of injuries sustained, utilization of hospital resources, and clinical outcomes.
Civilian intentional and terror-related explosions were found to be similar in most aspects except for factors directly influencing mortality and a larger volume of severely injured body regions among terror-victims. Comparisons between other groups produced some parallels, albeit less consistent. Civilian intentional explosions and civilian unintentional explosions were different from each other in most aspects. The latter group also differed from others by its high volume of life-threatening burns and a higher proportion of children casualties.
While consistent similarities between explosion casualties exist, especially between victims of intentional civilian and terror-related explosions, the general rule is that clinical experience with a type of explosion cannot be directly transferred to other types.
比较不同类型爆炸的损伤模式。
对1997年1月至2018年12月以色列国家创伤登记处记录的4508例因爆炸住院患者进行回顾性研究。这些事件分为4组:与恐怖主义相关的、与战争相关的、平民故意爆炸和民用意外爆炸。对各组在受伤情况、医院资源利用和临床结果方面进行比较。
发现平民故意爆炸和与恐怖主义相关的爆炸在大多数方面相似,但在直接影响死亡率的因素以及恐怖袭击受害者中重伤身体部位数量较多方面存在差异。其他组之间的比较有一些相似之处,尽管不太一致。平民故意爆炸和民用意外爆炸在大多数方面彼此不同。后一组还因其大量危及生命的烧伤和较高比例的儿童伤亡与其他组不同。
虽然爆炸伤亡之间存在一致的相似之处,特别是在平民故意爆炸受害者和与恐怖主义相关的爆炸受害者之间,但一般规则是,一种类型爆炸的临床经验不能直接应用于其他类型。