Suppr超能文献

尸体研究以评估S1神经切除术和对侧S1转移术治疗痉挛性偏瘫的可行性。

Cadaveric study to assess the feasibility of S1 neurectomy and contralateral S1 transfer for spastic hemiparesis.

作者信息

Agarwal Pawan, Nivasarkar Sanat, Agrawal Natwar, Bajaj Jitin, Parihar Vijay, Yadav Y R, Sharma Dhananjaya

机构信息

Head, Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, MP, 482003, India.

Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, MP, 482003, India.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2022 Apr 21;31:99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.04.010. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Acquired brain injury causing spasticity, pain and loss of function is a major cause of disability and lower quality of life. Sacral 1 (S1) neurectomy claims promising outcomes in spastic hemiparesis. This cadaveric study was conducted to study the surgical anatomy, surgical approach and feasibility of S1 neurectomy and contralateral S1 (cS1) transfer.

METHODS

This study was conducted over a period of 10 months and 10 cadavers (age 18-60 years, 7 male and 3 female) were included in the study. 2 cadavers underwent endoscopic S1 neurectomy and 8 cadavers underwent open S1 neurectomy. Mean S1 root length and diameter were recorded using Schirmer tear strips and Vernier calliper. Feasibility of transfer was also assessed by measuring the length of donor nerve and distance between distal ends to proximal end of recipient nerve.

RESULTS

Mean thickness of right S1 root was 4.02 ± 1.5 mm and left S1 was 3.89 ± 1.18 mm. Mean length of right S1 root was 24.9 ± 4.56 mm and left S1 was 23.6 ± 2.86 mm. Endoscopically dissected length of S1 was much less as compared to open technique.

CONCLUSION

S1 neurectomy is simple procedure to reduce spasticity in lower limb without any permanent deficit. It can be done by open as well as with endoscopic approach while for contralateral S1 transfer open approach need to be used.

摘要

目的

后天性脑损伤导致痉挛、疼痛和功能丧失是残疾和生活质量下降的主要原因。骶1(S1)神经切除术在痉挛性偏瘫方面显示出有前景的结果。本尸体研究旨在探讨S1神经切除术及对侧S1(cS1)转移的手术解剖、手术入路及可行性。

方法

本研究历时10个月,纳入10具尸体(年龄18 - 60岁,男7具,女3具)。2具尸体接受内镜下S1神经切除术,8具尸体接受开放性S1神经切除术。使用施密特泪纸条和游标卡尺记录S1神经根的平均长度和直径。还通过测量供体神经长度和受体神经远端到近端的距离来评估转移的可行性。

结果

右侧S1神经根平均厚度为4.02±1.5毫米,左侧S1为3.89±1.18毫米。右侧S1神经根平均长度为24.9±4.56毫米,左侧S1为23.6±2.86毫米。与开放技术相比,内镜下解剖的S1长度要短得多。

结论

S1神经切除术是一种简单的减少下肢痉挛的手术,不会造成任何永久性缺陷。可通过开放手术及内镜手术进行,而对侧S1转移则需要采用开放手术入路。

相似文献

3
Nerve transfer in the spastic upper limb: anatomical feasibility study.痉挛上肢的神经转移:解剖学可行性研究。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Feb;44(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02810-w. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

4
Rewiring to Regain Function in Patients with Spastic Hemiplegia.通过重新布线恢复痉挛性偏瘫患者的功能
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):83-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1713313. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
The diameters and number of nerve fibers in spinal nerve roots.脊神经根中神经纤维的直径和数量。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Jul;38(4):532-7. doi: 10.1179/1079026814Z.000000000273. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验