Odelola Oluwaseyi, Akadri Adebayo
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2019 Oct-Dec;9(4):8-14. doi: 10.4103/jwas.JWAS_25_21. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
Antenatal clinic is an opportunity to counsel women on the need for postpartum contraception. This study was designed to determine the effect of structured antenatal counselling on postpartum contraceptive uptake.
A prospective intervention study was conducted in the antenatal clinic of Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu from July 15, 2018 to June 31, 2019. Two hundred antenatal attendees were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. Women in the control group had routine antenatal counselling by the nurses/midwives, whereas those in the intervention group had well-structured antenatal contraceptive education sessions at each antenatal visit. A data capture sheet was used to obtain relevant information at presentation in labor and completed 6 months postpartum through phone conversation.
The overall contraceptive acceptor prevalence was 35.5%. Majority of the contraceptive acceptors (42.3%) opted for intrauterine contraceptive devices. The contraceptive prevalence among the intervention group was 45% when compared with 26% among the controls. This was statistically significant ( =7.883, = 0.005). However, after multivariate logistic regression analysis, the intervention (structured antenatal counselling) was not found to be a significant determinant of postpartum contraceptive uptake [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.0; confidence interval (CI) 0.4-2.2; = 0.941). Previous history of contraceptive usage, attending six or more antenatal visits, and Islamic religion were significant determinants of postpartum contraceptive uptake [(AOR 34.3; CI 7.1-164.6; < 0.001) (AOR 8.0; CI 2.9-22.3; < 0.001) (AOR 8.3; CI 3.3-10.0; < 0.001), respectively].
Incorporation of structured antenatal contraceptives counselling was not significantly better than routine antenatal care in its effect on postpartum contraceptive uptake. There is need for deliberate efforts to encourage women to attend antenatal clinics in which contraceptive information would be provided during routine visits.
产前检查是为女性提供产后避孕咨询的契机。本研究旨在确定结构化产前咨询对产后避孕措施采用情况的影响。
2018年7月15日至2019年6月31日,在萨加穆的奥拉比西·奥纳班乔大学教学医院的产前诊所进行了一项前瞻性干预研究。200名产前检查者被随机分为干预组和对照组。对照组的女性由护士/助产士进行常规产前咨询,而干预组的女性在每次产前检查时都接受了精心组织的产前避孕教育课程。使用数据采集表在分娩时获取相关信息,并在产后6个月通过电话交谈完成。
总体避孕措施采用率为35.5%。大多数采用避孕措施者(42.3%)选择了宫内节育器。干预组的避孕采用率为45%,而对照组为26%。这具有统计学意义(χ² = 7.883,P = 0.005)。然而,经过多因素逻辑回归分析,干预措施(结构化产前咨询)并未被发现是产后避孕措施采用的显著决定因素[调整后的优势比(AOR)为1.0;置信区间(CI)为0.4 - 2.2;P = 0.941]。既往避孕使用史、参加6次或更多次产前检查以及伊斯兰教是产后避孕措施采用的显著决定因素[分别为(AOR 34.3;CI 7.1 - 164.6;P < 0.001)(AOR 8.0;CI 2.9 - 22.3;P < 0.001)(AOR 8.3;CI 3.3 - 10.0;P < 0.001)]。
结构化产前避孕咨询在对产后避孕措施采用情况的影响方面并不显著优于常规产前护理。需要做出刻意努力来鼓励女性参加产前诊所,以便在常规就诊期间提供避孕信息。