• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医疗保险行业:另一种观点。

The U.S. health insurance industry: an alternative view.

作者信息

Woodward A

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1978;8(3):491-507. doi: 10.2190/75KA-EK33-FX0F-0TY0.

DOI:10.2190/75KA-EK33-FX0F-0TY0
PMID:355153
Abstract

The health insurance industry in the U.S. can be characterized as a concentrated industry. It has evolved into its current structure as a result of certain historical conditions, particularly those following the Great Depression. The structure of the industry has had an effect on the manner in which the industry functions and the cost increases in the health care sector. Specifically, the pricing mechanism is that of a price leader setting a limit price; health premium prices are higher than would be expected under a competitive structure. Regulation has been ineffective, because it has been dominated historically by health care providers and insurers. The costs of health care in general, and hospital care in particular, have increased beyond what would be expected as a result of "cost-pass-through."

摘要

美国的医疗保险行业可被视为一个集中型行业。由于某些历史条件,特别是大萧条之后的那些条件,它演变成了当前的结构。该行业的结构对行业的运作方式以及医疗保健部门的成本增加产生了影响。具体而言,定价机制是价格领导者设定限价;医疗保险费价格高于竞争结构下预期的价格。监管一直无效,因为它在历史上一直由医疗保健提供者和保险公司主导。总体而言,医疗保健成本,尤其是医院护理成本,因“成本转嫁”而超出了预期的增长幅度。

相似文献

1
The U.S. health insurance industry: an alternative view.美国医疗保险行业:另一种观点。
Int J Health Serv. 1978;8(3):491-507. doi: 10.2190/75KA-EK33-FX0F-0TY0.
2
Administrative costs of Medicare contractors: Blue Cross plans versus commercial intermediaries.医疗保险承办商的行政成本:蓝十字计划与商业中介机构对比
Inquiry. 1978 Dec;15(4):371-8.
3
Wis. hospitals brandish self-insurance scalpel.威斯康星州的医院挥舞着自保这把手术刀。
Bus Insur. 1979 Apr 30;13(9):115.
4
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
5
Insurance nor'easter. Thanks to merger, hospitals see benefits from competition with Blues.保险领域的东北风暴。多亏了合并,医院从与蓝十字蓝盾的竞争中受益。
Mod Healthc. 2011 Jan 31;41(5):14-5.
6
How the private sector is fighting health cost inflation.私营部门如何应对医疗成本通胀。
Aging. 1979 May-Jun(295-296):16-20.
7
Hospital prices and market structure in the hospital and insurance industries.医院和保险行业的医院价格和市场结构。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Oct;5(4):459-79. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000083. Epub 2010 May 18.
8
HEW study finds commercial insurers "more cost-minimizing" than Blue Cross-Blue Shield.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev. 1977 Feb;31(8):54-6.
9
Consequences of increased third-party payments for health care services.医疗保健服务第三方支付增加的后果。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1979 May(443):25-40.
10
Employer-based health insurance.基于雇主的医疗保险。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1982 Summer;7(2):366-79. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7-2-366.