Barlow Blake T, Roberts Russel J, Newman Kelly, Harrison Sarah K, Sin Jonathan H
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):20-25. doi: 10.1177/0018578720970457. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
Providers often admit patients with active outpatient prescriptions for levothyroxine. During an inpatient admission, providers may instruct critically ill patients to take nothing by mouth, or (NPO). Thus, they may prescribe the intravenous (IV) formulation of levothyroxine during this period. However, levothyroxine possesses a prolonged half-life of up to 7 days; therefore, immediate transition to IV levothyroxine may not be clinically necessary in the acute NPO setting. Intravenous levothyroxine is significantly more expensive than equivalent oral doses and may prove to be a financial burden for an institution. By understanding the pharmacokinetic properties of levothyroxine, we implemented a cost-saving initiative involving a 5-day therapeutic hold of IV levothyroxine. This was a retrospective evaluation in 2 intensive care units (ICU): a 20-bed surgical/trauma ICU and an 18-bed mixed medical/surgical ICU. Patient data, utilization data, and documented pharmacist interventions were collected for 6 months prior to implementation of the 5-day IV levothyroxine therapeutic hold and for 6 months post-implementation. All patients prescribed IV levothyroxine during these timeframes were included. During the 6-month pre-implementation phase, 674 doses (691 vials) of IV levothyroxine for 77 unique patients were dispensed from the 2 ICUs. During the 6-month post-implementation phase, 168 doses (188 vials) of IV levothyroxine were dispensed for 44 unique patients. Of the 44 patients (48 orders) who still received IV levothyroxine, 22.9% of orders were deemed clinically necessary by the pharmacist and were not recommended to be held under the protocol, 64.6% were due to the verifying pharmacist being unaware of the protocol, 8.3% of orders were due to protocol non-compliance, and 4.2% were verified after the 5-day hold was complete as the patient remained NPO. This pharmacy-led initiative resulted in a 75% decrease in usage post-implementation and an estimated annualized savings of $80,000. A pharmacy-led initiative comprised of a 5-day therapeutic hold of IV levothyroxine was feasible and led to a 75% reduction in usage and cost over a 6-month period in 2 ICU's. Future steps include additional staff education for improved protocol adherence and expanding the protocol institution-wide for an even greater cost-savings potential.
医疗服务提供者经常收治正在接受左甲状腺素门诊活性处方治疗的患者。在住院期间,医疗服务提供者可能会指示重症患者禁食,即“无口进食”(NPO)。因此,他们可能会在此期间开具左甲状腺素的静脉注射(IV)制剂。然而,左甲状腺素的半衰期长达7天;因此,在急性禁食情况下立即转换为静脉注射左甲状腺素在临床上可能没有必要。静脉注射左甲状腺素比同等口服剂量的药物贵得多,可能会给机构带来经济负担。通过了解左甲状腺素的药代动力学特性,我们实施了一项节省成本的举措,即对静脉注射左甲状腺素进行5天的治疗性停药。这是在2个重症监护病房(ICU)进行的回顾性评估:一个有20张床位的外科/创伤ICU和一个有18张床位的内科/外科混合ICU。在实施5天静脉注射左甲状腺素治疗性停药前6个月和实施后6个月收集患者数据、使用数据和有记录的药剂师干预措施。纳入了在这些时间段内所有开具静脉注射左甲状腺素处方的患者。在实施前的6个月阶段,从2个ICU为77名不同患者发放了674剂(691瓶)静脉注射左甲状腺素。在实施后的6个月阶段,为44名不同患者发放了168剂(188瓶)静脉注射左甲状腺素。在仍接受静脉注射左甲状腺素的44名患者(48份医嘱)中,药剂师认为22.9%的医嘱在临床上是必要的,不建议按照方案停药,64.6%是由于审核药剂师不知道该方案,8.3%的医嘱是由于未遵守方案,4.2%是在5天停药期结束后核实的,因为患者仍处于禁食状态。这项由药房主导的举措在实施后使使用量减少了75%,估计每年节省8万美元。一项由药房主导的举措,包括对静脉注射左甲状腺素进行5天的治疗性停药,是可行的,并在2个ICU的6个月期间使使用量和成本降低了75%。未来的步骤包括对更多工作人员进行教育,以提高对方案的依从性,并在全机构范围内推广该方案,以实现更大的成本节约潜力。