Ilie Mirela Diana, Vasiljevic Alexandre, Jouanneau Emmanuel, Raverot Gérald
Inserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Endocrinology Department, 'C.I. Parhon' National Institute of Endocrinology, Bucharest, Romania.
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2022 May 27;29(7):415-426. doi: 10.1530/ERC-22-0037.
Once temozolomide has failed, there is no recommended treatment option for pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumors. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent the most recent therapeutic avenue, having raised hope with the publication of the first successful case in 2018. Here, we present an overview of immunotherapy in pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumors, starting with the rationale for using ICIs and the implications of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in anterior pituitary tumors, followed by a systematic review of all published cases, analyzing both treatment response and potential predictors of response and finishing with research and clinical perspectives. Seven corticotroph and four lactotroph tumors have been so far treated with ICIs. Corticotroph tumors showed radiological partial response in 57% of cases, followed by stable disease in 29% of cases, which was accompanied by biochemical partial or complete response in 83% of cases. Half of lactotroph tumors showed radiological complete or partial response, accompanied by biochemical complete response in 33% of the cases. In the case of a dissociate response, continuation of immunotherapy combined with local treatment represents a good option. At this time, a high tumor mutational burden appears to be the most promising predictive marker of response. MMR deficiency does not guarantee a response. Negative PD-L1 staining should not preclude ICIs administration. Therefore, ICIs are a promising option after temozolomide failure. This review highlights key clinical aspects that can already be implemented into practice and also discusses tumor biology concepts and perspectives expected to improve immunotherapy outcomes.
一旦替莫唑胺治疗失败,垂体癌和侵袭性垂体肿瘤就没有推荐的治疗方案。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是最新的治疗途径,2018年首例成功病例的发表带来了希望。在此,我们概述垂体癌和侵袭性垂体肿瘤的免疫治疗,首先介绍使用ICIs的理论依据以及垂体前叶肿瘤中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的意义,接着对所有已发表病例进行系统综述,分析治疗反应和反应的潜在预测因素,最后阐述研究和临床前景。到目前为止,已有7例促肾上腺皮质激素细胞肿瘤和4例催乳素细胞肿瘤接受了ICIs治疗。促肾上腺皮质激素细胞肿瘤在57%的病例中显示出放射学部分缓解,29%的病例病情稳定,其中83%的病例伴有生化部分或完全缓解。一半的催乳素细胞肿瘤显示出放射学完全或部分缓解,33%的病例伴有生化完全缓解。在出现分离反应的情况下,继续免疫治疗并结合局部治疗是一个不错的选择。目前,高肿瘤突变负荷似乎是最有希望的反应预测标志物。错配修复缺陷并不能保证有反应。程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)染色阴性不应排除使用ICIs。因此,在替莫唑胺治疗失败后,ICIs是一个有前景的选择。本综述强调了一些关键的临床方面,这些方面已经可以应用于实践,同时也讨论了有望改善免疫治疗结果的肿瘤生物学概念和前景。