Struck R F, Alberts D S, Horne K, Phillips J G, Peng Y M, Roe D J
Cancer Res. 1987 May 15;47(10):2723-6.
Since cyclophosphamide is used by both oral and i.v. routes in the treatment of hematological and solid malignancies, we designed a randomized, crossover clinical trial to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of this anticancer agent after either administration route. Plasma levels of cyclophosphamide and its two cytotoxic metabolites, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard, were determined in seven cancer patients randomly assigned to treatment initially with either orally or i.v. administered cyclophosphamide with a 30-day interim between alternate therapy courses. Oral treatment was used initially in five patients and i.v. treatment in two patients, and the pharmacokinetic parameter, area under the plasma disappearance curve, was determined for each metabolite in each patient for both routes of drug administration. Statistical comparison of area under the plasma disappearance curve values for this set of patients indicated no significant differences for either metabolite for oral versus i.v. drug treatment, suggesting equal efficacy for these two routes of cyclophosphamide administration.
由于环磷酰胺可通过口服和静脉注射两种途径用于治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤和实体瘤,我们设计了一项随机交叉临床试验,以评估该抗癌药物在两种给药途径后的药代动力学。在7名癌症患者中测定了环磷酰胺及其两种细胞毒性代谢产物4-羟基环磷酰胺和磷酰胺氮芥的血浆水平,这些患者被随机分配,最初接受口服或静脉注射环磷酰胺治疗,交替治疗疗程之间有30天的间隔期。最初5名患者采用口服治疗,2名患者采用静脉注射治疗,测定了每位患者在两种给药途径下每种代谢产物的药代动力学参数——血浆消除曲线下面积。对这组患者的血浆消除曲线下面积值进行统计比较表明,口服与静脉注射药物治疗时,两种代谢产物均无显著差异,这表明环磷酰胺的这两种给药途径疗效相当。