Analysis of the social acceptability of a humanized childbirth intervention in Senegal: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND

In efforts to improve the quality of women's care and enhance related experiences in Senegal, the Senegalese government implemented an intervention named "humanized childbirth" in their health facilities.

AIM

To analyze the social acceptability of humanized childbirth as well as its relevance given the social values in Senegal.

METHODS

A multiple-case study was conducted within four health facilities in Dakar. Breastfeeding mothers (n = 20), pregnant women (n = 4), midwives (n = 8), Bajenu Gox (n = 4), members of the Health Development Committee (n = 4), and men from the community (n = 4) were interviewed individually, and a documentary analysis was done. The thematic analysis was performed using the acceptability theoretical framework.

FINDINGS

The results show that most participants agreed with the idea of humanized childbirth. However, participants display varying viewpoints as to the social acceptability of various components of the intervention. While there is an overall agreement concerning the benefits of motivated and attentive health professionals focused on prevention, restoring dignity for the parturient woman, freedom to eat and drink, massages and relaxation, the same cannot be said about the freedom of choice for birth positions and companionship.

DISCUSSION

The contrasting viewpoints as to the acceptability of humanized childbirth can be explained by the perception of risk and lack of experience with free birthing positions, as well as structural and cultural barriers surrounding the notion of companionship.

CONCLUSION

Education and awareness of the benefits of free birthing positions and companionship would be required among Senegalese women to enable a cultural shift in maternity wards in Senegal.