Ostuzzi Giovanni, Bertolini Federico, Tedeschi Federico, Vita Giovanni, Brambilla Paolo, Del Fabro Lorenzo, Gastaldon Chiara, Papola Davide, Purgato Marianna, Nosari Guido, Del Giovane Cinzia, Correll Christoph U, Barbui Corrado
WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):295-307. doi: 10.1002/wps.20972.
According to current evidence and guidelines, continued antipsychotic treatment is key for preventing relapse in people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, but evidence-based recommendations for the choice of the individual antipsychotic for maintenance treatment are lacking. Although oral antipsychotics are often prescribed first line for practical reasons, long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are a valuable resource to tackle adherence issues since the earliest phase of disease. Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and CINAHL databases and online registers were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing LAIs or oral antipsychotics head-to-head or against placebo, published until June 2021. Relative risks and standardized mean differences were pooled using random-effects pairwise and network meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were relapse and dropout due to adverse events. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess study quality, and the CINeMA approach to assess the confidence of pooled estimates. Of 100 eligible trials, 92 (N=22,645) provided usable data for meta-analyses. Regarding relapse prevention, the vast majority of the 31 included treatments outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, "high" confidence in the results was found for (in descending order of effect magnitude) amisulpride-oral (OS), olanzapine-OS, aripiprazole-LAI, olanzapine-LAI, aripiprazole-OS, paliperidone-OS, and ziprasidone-OS. "Moderate" confidence in the results was found for paliperidone-LAI 1-monthly, iloperidone-OS, fluphenazine-OS, brexpiprazole-OS, paliperidone-LAI 1-monthly, asenapine-OS, haloperidol-OS, quetiapine-OS, cariprazine-OS, and lurasidone-OS. Regarding tolerability, none of the antipsychotics was significantly worse than placebo, but confidence was poor, with only aripiprazole (both LAI and OS) showing "moderate" confidence levels. Based on these findings, olanzapine, aripiprazole and paliperidone are the best choices for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, considering that both LAI and oral formulations of these antipsychotics are among the best-performing treatments and have the highest confidence of evidence for relapse prevention. This finding is of particular relevance for low- and middle-income countries and constrained-resource settings, where few medications may be selected. Results from this network meta-analysis can inform clinical guidelines and national and international drug regulation policies.
根据目前的证据和指南,持续使用抗精神病药物治疗是预防精神分裂症谱系障碍患者复发的关键,但缺乏关于选择个体抗精神病药物进行维持治疗的循证推荐。尽管出于实际原因,口服抗精神病药物通常被作为一线用药,但长效注射用抗精神病药物(LAIs)从疾病的最早阶段起就是解决依从性问题的宝贵资源。检索了Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CENTRAL和CINAHL数据库以及在线注册库,以识别截至2021年6月发表的比较LAIs或口服抗精神病药物直接对比或与安慰剂对比的随机对照试验。使用随机效应成对和网络荟萃分析汇总相对风险和标准化均值差异。主要结局是因不良事件导致的复发和退出。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量,并使用CINeMA方法评估汇总估计的可信度。在100项符合条件的试验中,92项(N = 22,645)提供了可用于荟萃分析的数据。关于预防复发,31种纳入治疗中的绝大多数表现优于安慰剂。与安慰剂相比,对于(按效应大小降序排列)氨磺必利口服制剂(OS)、奥氮平-OS、阿立哌唑-LAI、奥氮平-LAI、阿立哌唑-OS、帕利哌酮-OS和齐拉西酮-OS,结果具有“高”可信度。对于每月一次的帕利哌酮-LAI、伊潘立酮-OS、氟奋乃静-OS、布瑞哌唑-OS、每月一次的帕利哌酮-LAI、阿塞那平-OS、氟哌啶醇-OS、喹硫平-OS、卡利拉嗪-OS和鲁拉西酮-OS,结果具有“中等”可信度。关于耐受性,没有一种抗精神病药物比安慰剂显著更差,但可信度较低,只有阿立哌唑(LAI和OS两种剂型)显示出“中等”可信度水平。基于这些发现,考虑到这些抗精神病药物的LAI和口服制剂都是表现最佳的治疗方法之一,并且在预防复发方面具有最高的证据可信度,奥氮平、阿立哌唑和帕利哌酮是精神分裂症谱系障碍维持治疗的最佳选择。这一发现对于低收入和中等收入国家以及资源有限的环境尤为重要,因为在这些地方可供选择的药物可能很少。该网络荟萃分析的结果可为临床指南以及国家和国际药物监管政策提供参考。