• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图标数组减少了对 COVID-19 疫苗副作用的担忧:一项随机对照研究。

Icon arrays reduce concern over COVID-19 vaccine side effects: a randomized control study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church St, East Hall, Room 1004i, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Department of Psychology, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 May 7;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00387-5.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-022-00387-5
PMID:35524896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9077983/
Abstract

On April 13, 2021, the CDC announced that the administration of Johnson and Johnson's COVID-19 vaccine would be paused due to a rare blood clotting side effect in ~ 0.0001% of people given the vaccine. Most people who are hesitant to get a COVID-19 vaccine list potential side effects as their main concern (PEW, 2021); thus, it is likely that this announcement increased vaccine hesitancy among the American public. Two days after the CDC's announcement, we administered a survey to a group of 2,046 Americans to assess their changes in attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines. The aim of this study was to investigate whether viewing icon arrays of side effect risk would prevent increases in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy due to the announcement. We found that using icon arrays to illustrate the small chance of experiencing the blood clotting side effect significantly prevented increases in aversion toward the Johnson and Johnson vaccine as well as all other COVID-19 vaccines.

摘要

2021 年 4 月 13 日,由于接受疫苗注射的人群中约有 0.0001%出现罕见的血栓副作用,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)宣布暂停使用强生公司的 COVID-19 疫苗。大多数对接种 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决的人将潜在的副作用列为他们主要关注的问题(PEW,2021 年);因此,这一声明很可能增加了美国公众对疫苗的犹豫。在 CDC 宣布两天后,我们对一组 2046 名美国人进行了调查,以评估他们对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度变化。这项研究的目的是调查查看副作用风险的图标数组是否可以防止因该声明而导致对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫情绪增加。我们发现,使用图标数组来说明经历血栓副作用的小概率,可显著降低对强生公司和所有其他 COVID-19 疫苗的厌恶感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/394833f7957e/41235_2022_387_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/23e819ab966a/41235_2022_387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/e9c1680ed5d5/41235_2022_387_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/394833f7957e/41235_2022_387_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/23e819ab966a/41235_2022_387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/e9c1680ed5d5/41235_2022_387_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6278/9079195/394833f7957e/41235_2022_387_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Icon arrays reduce concern over COVID-19 vaccine side effects: a randomized control study.图标数组减少了对 COVID-19 疫苗副作用的担忧:一项随机对照研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 May 7;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00387-5.
2
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
3
Changes in general and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among U.S. adults from 2021 to 2022.2021 年至 2022 年美国成年人对一般疫苗和 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的变化。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2357230. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2357230. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Effect of the suspension of the J&J COVID-19 vaccine on vaccine hesitancy in the United States.暂停使用强生公司的 COVID-19 疫苗对美国疫苗犹豫的影响。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 24;40(3):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.085. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
Tolerance for three commonly administered COVID-19 vaccines by healthcare professionals.医护人员对三种常用 COVID-19 疫苗的耐受性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;10:975781. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.975781. eCollection 2022.
6
Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, December 2021.使用杨森(强生) COVID-19 疫苗:免疫实践咨询委员会对美国 2021 年 12 月更新的临时建议。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 21;71(3):90-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7103a4.
7
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy after side effects to the first vaccine: what are our options?首剂疫苗出现副作用后对新冠疫苗接种的犹豫:我们有哪些选择?
QJM. 2022 May 10;115(5):267. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcac106.
8
The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccinations in the United States.美国 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性概况。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Jan;50(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Vaccine hesitancy, state bias, and Covid-19: Evidence from a survey experiment using Phase-3 results announcement by BioNTech and Pfizer.疫苗犹豫、国家偏见与新冠疫情:基于 BioNTech 和辉瑞第三阶段试验结果公布的调查实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114115. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114115. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
10
Exploring the adverse events of Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 vaccination on Guillain-Barré Syndrome.探讨牛津-阿斯利康、辉瑞-BioNTech、莫德纳和强生 COVID-19 疫苗接种对吉兰-巴雷综合征的不良事件。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;14(1):18767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66999-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Narrative visualizations: Depicting accumulating risks and increasing trust in data.叙事可视化:描绘不断累积的风险以及对数据日益增长的信任。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Feb 21;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00613-w.
2
Prospective Analysis of Arteriovenous Fistula Performance in the Context of Competing Risks.在竞争风险背景下对动静脉内瘘功能的前瞻性分析
Kidney360. 2025 Feb 1;6(2):272-283. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000650. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
A Retrospective Evaluation of Self-Reported Adverse Events Following Immunization with Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Türkiye.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial.探究图标阵列中不确定性的呈现方式:一项随机试验。
PEC Innov. 2022 Dec;1:None. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100003.
3
Graphs do not lead people to infer causation from correlation.图形不会引导人们从相关性推断因果关系。
土耳其不同新冠疫苗接种后自我报告不良事件的回顾性评估
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;11(2):316. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020316.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022 Jun;28(2):314-328. doi: 10.1037/xap0000393. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
Using Icon Arrays to Communicate Gambling Information Reduces the Appeal of Scratch Card Games.使用图标阵列传达赌博信息会降低刮刮卡游戏的吸引力。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):363-382. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10103-5. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework.贝叶斯框架下效应存在性和显著性的指标
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767. eCollection 2019.
6
Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines.可视化决策:跨学科的认知框架
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Jul 11;3:29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0120-9. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Blinded with Science or Informed by Charts? A Replication Study.盲目迷信科学还是受图表影响?一项复制研究。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Jan;24(1):781-790. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744298. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
8
Blinded with science: Trivial graphs and formulas increase ad persuasiveness and belief in product efficacy.盲目迷信科学:简单的图表和公式会增加广告的说服力和人们对产品功效的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):117-25. doi: 10.1177/0963662514549688. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
9
Communicating global cardiovascular risk: are icon arrays better than numerical estimates in improving understanding, recall and perception of risk?传达全球心血管风险:在提高对风险的理解、记忆和认知方面,图标阵列是否优于数值估计?
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
Estimating large numbers.估算大数。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;37(5):775-99. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 5.