Suppr超能文献

我们的做法:学生视角下的妇产科住院医师申请流程变化

How We Do It: Student Perspectives on Changes to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Application Process.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2022 Sep-Oct;79(5):1093-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perspectives of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency applicants regarding new standards for the 2019 to 2020 application cycle.

DESIGN

An anonymous electronic survey was sent to all OBGYN residency applicants to US programs retrospectively evaluating 5 new recommended standards for the application process. This 15-item survey assessed the importance of the proposed standards and their impact on applicants' anxiety.

SETTING

The OBGYN residency application process is marked by increasing application numbers and no standardization for managing interview offers. The Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) received a 5-year Reimagining Residency grant from the American Medical Association to improve the transition from undergraduate medical education (UME) to graduate medical education (GME) within OBGYN. The multiphase project, "Transforming the UME to GME Transition for Obstetrics and Gynecology- Right Resident, Right Program, Ready Day One (RRR)," began with Standardizing the OBGYN Application and Interview Process (SOAIP). This group recommended 5 new standards for all US OBGYN residency programs and applicants.

PARTICIPANTS

Applicants for US OBGYN residency programs for the 2019 to 2020 application cycle completed the survey, with a 904/2508 (36.0%) response rate, including 762 complete responses (30.4%).

RESULTS

Applicants reported that all 5 of the new standards would cause the least self-perceived anxiety (range 76.8% - 96.5%). The impact of the standards on perceived anxiety varied by student group, with International Medical Graduates (IMGs) and students with USMLE Step I scores <200 describing lesser impact compared to others. Despite these differences, all 5 standards were consistently noted to cause the least anxiety for all groups. Despite varying degrees of effects in different groups, the new OBGYN residency application standards caused the least anxiety for all subgroups of applicants.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing universal standards for the OBGYN residency application process was favorably perceived by applicants and caused the least anxiety for applicants.

摘要

目的

描述妇产科(OBGYN)住院医师申请人对 2019 至 2020 申请周期新标准的看法。

设计

一项匿名电子调查被发送给所有美国妇产科住院医师项目的申请人,以回顾性评估申请流程中的 5 项新推荐标准。这项 15 项的调查评估了拟议标准的重要性及其对申请人焦虑的影响。

背景

妇产科住院医师申请流程的特点是申请人数不断增加,且没有用于管理面试机会的标准化流程。妇产学教授协会(APGO)从美国医学协会获得了为期 5 年的重新构想住院医师项目赠款,旨在改善妇产科本科医学教育(UME)到研究生医学教育(GME)的过渡。该多阶段项目“为妇产科转变 UME 到 GME 过渡——合适的住院医师、合适的项目、第一天准备就绪(RRR)”以标准化妇产科申请和面试流程(SOAIP)开始。该组织建议所有美国妇产科住院医师项目采用 5 项新的标准。

参与者

参加 2019 至 2020 申请周期的美国妇产科住院医师项目的申请人完成了调查,回复率为 904/2508(36.0%),其中 762 人完成了完整的回复(30.4%)。

结果

申请人报告称,所有 5 项新的标准将导致最低的自我感知焦虑(范围为 76.8%至 96.5%)。这些标准对感知焦虑的影响因学生群体而异,国际医学毕业生(IMG)和 USMLE 第一阶段得分<200 的学生描述的影响小于其他学生。尽管存在这些差异,但所有 5 项标准都被一致认为对所有群体的焦虑程度最低。尽管在不同群体中存在不同程度的影响,但新的妇产科住院医师申请标准对所有申请人亚组都导致了最低的焦虑。

结论

为妇产科住院医师申请流程实施通用标准受到申请人的欢迎,并对申请人造成的焦虑最小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验