• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺移植中的患者重要结局:系统评价。

Patient-important outcomes in lung transplantation: A systematic review.

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie B et Transplantation Pulmonaire, APHP.Nord-Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France; Physiopathology and Epidemiology of Respiratory Diseases, UMR1152 INSERM and Université de Paris, Paris, France.

INSERM CIC-EC1425, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; APHP, département Epidémiologie Biostatistiques et Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.

出版信息

Respir Med Res. 2022 May;81:100896. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2022.100896. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.resmer.2022.100896
PMID:35526317
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-important outcomes (PIOs) have emerged in respiratory medicine, in order to place the patient at the center of research. Mortality is a debated PIO in lung transplantation (LTx). The use of PIO in this specific setting has never been studied. We aimed to systematically review the use of PIOs in LTx research.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched to include prospective studies published in 2019, involving adult LTx recipients. We excluded articles reporting non-prognostic studies, letters, reviews, commentaries, or case reports. PIOs considered were mortality, pain, physical function, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, neuropsychological, cardiac, sleep or sexual symptoms and quality of life. This systematic review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42020163425).

RESULTS

Among 1048 references retrieved, 51 were finally included in the analysis. In total, 26 (51%) studies investigated at least one PIO, as a primary outcome in 12 (23.5%) and secondary outcome in 21 (41.2%). In 15 (29.4%) studies, mortality was the most frequently reported PIO; 11 (21.5%) studies evaluated at least one PIO other than mortality, quality of life being this PIO in 6.

CONCLUSIONS

PIOs were described in half of prospective articles dealing with adult LTx recipients published in 2019. Outcomes other than mortality were insufficiently considered. A core outcome set of PIOs in LTx should be developed with patient input to guide future research in LTx.

摘要

背景

为了将患者置于研究的中心,患者重要结局(PIO)已在呼吸医学中出现。死亡率是肺移植(LTx)中备受争议的 PIO。在这种特定环境中使用 PIO 从未被研究过。我们旨在系统地回顾 LTx 研究中 PIO 的使用情况。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库,纳入 2019 年发表的涉及成人 LTx 受者的前瞻性研究。我们排除了报告非预后研究、信件、综述、评论或病例报告的文章。考虑的 PIO 包括死亡率、疼痛、身体功能、肺部、胃肠道、神经心理学、心脏、睡眠或性功能障碍以及生活质量。这项系统评价前瞻性地在 PROSPERO 登记处(CRD42020163425)进行了登记。

结果

在检索到的 1048 篇参考文献中,最终有 51 篇被纳入分析。共有 26 项(51%)研究调查了至少一项 PIO,其中 12 项(23.5%)为主要结局,21 项(41.2%)为次要结局。在 15 项(29.4%)研究中,死亡率是最常报告的 PIO;11 项(21.5%)研究评估了除死亡率以外的至少一项 PIO,其中 6 项研究将生活质量作为 PIO。

结论

2019 年发表的涉及成人 LTx 受者的前瞻性文章中,有一半描述了 PIO。其他结局,而非死亡率,未得到充分考虑。应在患者参与的情况下制定 LTx 中 PIO 的核心结局集,以指导未来的 LTx 研究。

相似文献

1
Patient-important outcomes in lung transplantation: A systematic review.肺移植中的患者重要结局:系统评价。
Respir Med Res. 2022 May;81:100896. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2022.100896. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Extracorporeal lung support technologies - bridge to recovery and bridge to lung transplantation in adult patients: an evidence-based analysis.体外肺支持技术——成人患者的康复桥梁和肺移植桥梁:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(5):1-47. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
3
Patient-important outcomes in clinical trials of atopic diseases and asthma in the last decade: A systematic review.过去十年特应性疾病和哮喘临床试验中对患者重要的结局:一项系统评价。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Apr 30;16(4):100769. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100769. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence.系统评价中的患者重要结局:证据质量差。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195460. eCollection 2018.
5
How Often Are Patient-Important Outcomes Represented in Neonatal Randomized Controlled Trials? An Analysis of Cochrane Neonatal Reviews.患者重要结局在新生儿随机对照试验中的报告频率如何?一项 Cochrane 新生儿评价分析。
Neonatology. 2020;117(4):428-435. doi: 10.1159/000506703. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
A systematic review of health-related quality of life and psychological outcomes after lung transplantation.肺移植后健康相关生活质量和心理结果的系统评价。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Feb;35(2):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
9
Health-related quality of life following single or bilateral lung transplantation: a 7-year comparison to functional outcome.单肺或双肺移植后的健康相关生活质量:与功能结局的7年比较
Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1371-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1371.
10
Pulmonary thromboembolism as a complication of lung transplantation.肺血栓栓塞作为肺移植的一种并发症。
Clin Transplant. 2017 Apr;31(4). doi: 10.1111/ctr.12922. Epub 2017 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-related Quality of Life and Exercise Capacity in Double Lung Transplant Recipients With Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction.基线肺移植功能障碍的双肺移植受者的健康相关生活质量和运动能力
Transplant Direct. 2025 Jan 9;11(2):e1751. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001751. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?将家长的声音融入极早产儿研究:我们正在做什么以及该何去何从?
J Perinatol. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02165-1.
3
Patient-important outcomes in clinical trials of atopic diseases and asthma in the last decade: A systematic review.
过去十年特应性疾病和哮喘临床试验中对患者重要的结局:一项系统评价。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Apr 30;16(4):100769. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100769. eCollection 2023 Apr.