Kjørstad Kaia, Sivertsen Børge, Vedaa Øystein, Langsrud Knut, Vethe Daniel, Faaland Patrick M, Vestergaard Cecilie L, Lydersen Stian, Smith Otto R F, Scott Jan, Kallestad Håvard
Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway; Department of Research and Innovation, Helse-Fonna HF, Haugesund, Norway.
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Jun;153:104083. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104083. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is a well-established treatment for insomnia, but few studies have explored its impact on work and activity impairment.
Data stem from 1721 participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of digital CBT-I compared with Patient Education. Baseline and 6-month follow-up assessments included self-reported ratings of presenteeism and general impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire), and absenteeism (hours of missed work) and employment status. Insomnia was measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Mediation analyses were conducted for each outcome with ISI scores at baseline and 9-week follow-up as the mediator. The analyses were adjusted for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, comorbidities).
dCBT-I was found to be associated with reduced activity impairment compared with PE (by 5.6%) but not presenteeism, absenteeism, or changes in employment status. Mediation analysis showed that changes in insomnia severity largely mediated improvements in presenteeism (by 5.4%) and activity impairment (by 5.5%). There were no significant mediational effects on absenteeism or employment status.
This study shows that dCBT-I is not only effective in improving insomnia. But also demonstrates positive effects on work and daily activities in general, supporting the need for increased access to dCBT-I.
失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)是一种成熟的失眠治疗方法,但很少有研究探讨其对工作和活动障碍的影响。
数据来源于1721名参与随机对照试验的参与者,该试验比较了数字CBT-I与患者教育的疗效。基线和6个月随访评估包括自我报告的出勤主义和一般障碍评分(工作效率和活动障碍问卷)、旷工(错过的工作小时数)和就业状况。使用失眠严重程度指数(ISI)测量失眠情况。对每个结果进行中介分析,以基线和9周随访时的ISI分数作为中介变量。分析对潜在混杂因素(如性别、年龄、合并症)进行了调整。
与患者教育相比,发现数字CBT-I与活动障碍减少相关(减少5.6%),但与出勤主义、旷工或就业状况变化无关。中介分析表明,失眠严重程度的变化在很大程度上介导了出勤主义(减少5.4%)和活动障碍(减少5.5%)的改善。对旷工或就业状况没有显著的中介效应。
本研究表明,数字CBT-I不仅在改善失眠方面有效,而且总体上对工作和日常活动也有积极影响,支持增加数字CBT-I可及性的必要性。