Department of Psychology and Education, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain.
Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jul;126:104239. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104239. Epub 2022 May 6.
Mixed methods intervention studies can improve the accuracy of interventional evaluations in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders by helping researchers gain a more nuanced understanding of how a particular intervention works. However, no studies to date have systematically examined the ways in which this type of studies have been carried out and reported.
To examine the methodological features and reporting practices found in mixed methods intervention studies in children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders.
Methodological review based on a systematic search from inception to July 2021 in Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS, and a hand search in seven journals.
We found 30 studies, most of them published since 2019. These studies reported several patterns of mixed methods use which illustrated the unique insights that researchers can gain by using this approach. We identified several ways that authors could more clearly report the justification for using a mixed methods approach, the description of the design used, and the evidence of integration of the quantitative and qualitative components.
We make recommendations for improving the reporting quality of mixed methods intervention studies in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders.
混合方法干预研究可以通过帮助研究人员更深入地了解特定干预措施的工作方式,从而提高情感和行为障碍领域干预评估的准确性。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究系统地检查过此类研究的开展和报告方式。
检查在患有情感和行为障碍的儿童和青少年中进行的混合方法干预研究的方法学特征和报告实践。
基于对 Embase、Medline、PsycINFO 和 SCOPUS 从成立到 2021 年 7 月的系统搜索,以及在七本期刊中的手工搜索,进行方法学综述。
我们发现了 30 项研究,其中大多数是在 2019 年之后发表的。这些研究报告了几种混合方法的使用模式,这些模式说明了研究人员通过使用这种方法可以获得的独特见解。我们确定了作者可以更清楚地报告使用混合方法的理由、所使用设计的描述以及定量和定性部分整合证据的几种方式。
我们针对情感和行为障碍领域的混合方法干预研究的报告质量提出了建议。