Suppr超能文献

房颤消融术后抗凝与左心耳封堵的比较:OPTION 随机试验的原理和设计。

Comparison of anticoagulation with left atrial appendage closure after atrial fibrillation ablation: Rationale and design of the OPTION randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.

Cardiology Department, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands/Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2022 Sep;251:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), physicians typically offer AF ablation for symptom relief; however, patients often anticipate/expect a life free from anticoagulation. This belief puts patients at increased risk of stroke due to the potential for asymptomatic AF postablation if anticoagulation is ceased contrary to clinical guidelines. Although the WATCHMAN device has been FDA-approved to decrease the risk of thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with an appropriate rationale to avoid oral anticoagulation, it has not been well-studied following AF ablation. Additionally, there are limited data comparing the WATCHMAN device to direct oral anticoagulants. The OPTION study will investigate whether LAA closure with the WATCHMAN FLX device is a reasonable alternative to oral anticoagulation following percutaneous catheter ablation for nonvalvular AF.

TRIAL DESIGN

OPTION is a multinational, multicenter, prospective randomized clinical trial. Patients with a CHADS-VASc of ≥2 in men or ≥3 in women and who underwent a AF catheter ablation procedure between 90 and 180 days prior to randomization (sequential) or are planning to have catheter ablation within 10 days of randomization (concomitant) will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation of WATCHMAN FLX vs control. Control patients will start or continue market-approved oral anticoagulation for the duration of the trial. A total of 1600 patients were randomized from 130 global investigational sites. Follow-up for both device and control patients will occur at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months. The primary effectiveness noninferiority endpoint is stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), all-cause death, or systemic embolism at 36 months. The primary safety superiority endpoint is nonprocedural bleeding through 36 months (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH] major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding). The secondary noninferiority endpoint is ISTH major bleeding through 36 months (including procedural bleeding).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of WATCHMAN FLX in a postablation contemporary clinical AF patient population at risk of stroke.

摘要

背景

对于有症状的心房颤动 (AF) 患者,医生通常会提供 AF 消融术以缓解症状;然而,患者通常预期/期望在抗凝治疗停止后无需再进行抗凝治疗。如果抗凝治疗与临床指南相悖,停止抗凝治疗会使患者在消融术后发生无症状 AF 的风险增加,从而导致中风。尽管 WATCHMAN 装置已获得美国食品药品监督管理局 (FDA) 的批准,可降低有适当理由避免口服抗凝药物的患者左心耳 (LAA) 血栓栓塞的风险,但在 AF 消融术后,该装置的研究并不充分。此外,比较 WATCHMAN 装置与直接口服抗凝剂的数据也很有限。 OPTION 研究将调查在非瓣膜性 AF 经皮导管消融术后,使用 WATCHMAN FLX 装置行 LAA 封堵是否可替代口服抗凝药物。

试验设计

OPTION 是一项多中心、多国前瞻性随机临床试验。随机分组前 90 至 180 天(序贯)或计划在随机分组后 10 天内(同时)行 AF 导管消融术的 CHADS-VASc 评分男性≥2 分或女性≥3 分的患者将以 1:1 的比例随机分为 WATCHMAN FLX 组与对照组。对照组患者将在整个试验期间开始或继续使用已上市的口服抗凝药物。共从全球 130 个研究中心随机入选 1600 例患者。WATCHMAN FLX 组和对照组患者的随访时间分别为 3、12、24 和 36 个月。主要有效性非劣效终点为 36 个月时的卒中(缺血性或出血性)、全因死亡或全身性栓塞。主要安全性优效终点为 36 个月时非手术相关出血(国际血栓与止血学会 [ISTH] 大出血或临床相关非大出血)。次要非劣效终点为 36 个月时 ISTH 大出血(包括手术相关出血)。

结论

这项试验将评估 WATCHMAN FLX 在有卒中风险的当代临床 AF 患者人群中消融术后的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验