Diken Turksayar Almira Ada, Donmez Mustafa Borga, Olcay Emin Orkun, Demirel Münir, Demir Esra
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey; Visiting Researcher, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland.
J Dent. 2022 Sep;124:104155. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104155. Epub 2022 May 6.
To evaluate the effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses fabricated by using additive manufacturing and to compare with those fabricated by subtractive manufacturing after thermomechanical aging.
A 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis was designed by using a dental design software (exocad DentalCAD 2.2 Valetta) in standard tessellation language (STL) format. This STL file was exported into a nesting software (PreForm) and 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses with 5 different orientations (0°, 30°, 45°, 90°, and 150°) were printed by using a 3-dimensional (3D) printing interim resin (Temporary CB) (n = 10). The same STL file was also used to mill polymethymethacrylate (DuoCAD) 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses as the control group (n = 10). All specimens were cemented onto cobalt-chromium test models representing a maxillary first premolar and first molar tooth with a long-term temporary cement (DentoTemp), and subjected to thermomechanical aging (120,000 cycles, 1.6 Hz, 50 N, 5-55 °C). Then, all specimens were loaded until fracture by using a universal tester. The data were analyzed with nonparametric 1-way analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis) and Dunn's tests (α = 0.05).
Additively manufactured specimens printed with 90° showed the lowest fracture strength values (P≤.048). However, the difference between specimens printed with 45° and 90° was nonsignificant (P>.05). Milled 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses withstood significantly higher loads than 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses printed with 45° and 150° (P≤.012). In addition, specimens printed with 0° showed higher fracture strength than the specimens printed with 45° (P=.01). Specimens printed with 0° and 30° presented similar fracture strength values with milled (P≥.057) and 150° printed (P>.05) specimens.
Printing orientation had a significant effect on the fracture strength of 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses. Among the additively manufactured samples, those printed with 0° showed similar fracture strength values with the subtractively manufactured samples.
Three-unit interim fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 0° and 30° using the 3D printing interim resin tested may be alternatives to milled PMMA in terms of fracture strength.
评估打印方向对采用增材制造法制作的3单位临时固定义齿断裂强度的影响,并与热机械老化后采用减材制造法制作的义齿进行比较。
使用牙科设计软件(exocad DentalCAD 2.2 Valetta)以标准镶嵌语言(STL)格式设计一个3单位固定义齿。将该STL文件导入排样软件(PreForm),使用三维(3D)打印临时树脂(Temporary CB)打印5种不同方向(0°、30°、45°、90°和150°)的3单位临时固定义齿(n = 10)。同一STL文件也用于铣削聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(DuoCAD)3单位临时固定义齿作为对照组(n = 10)。所有标本用长效临时粘固剂(DentoTemp)粘固到代表上颌第一前磨牙和第一磨牙的钴铬测试模型上,并进行热机械老化(120,000次循环,1.6 Hz,50 N,5 - 55°C)。然后,使用万能试验机对所有标本加载直至断裂。数据采用非参数单因素方差分析(Kruskal - Wallis)和邓恩检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。
以90°打印的增材制造标本显示出最低的断裂强度值(P≤0.048)。然而,45°和90°打印的标本之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。铣削的3单位临时固定义齿比45°和150°打印的3单位临时固定义齿承受的载荷显著更高(P≤0.012)。此外,0°打印的标本比45°打印的标本显示出更高的断裂强度(P = 0.01)。0°和30°打印的标本与铣削(P≥0.057)和150°打印(P>0.05)的标本呈现出相似的断裂强度值。
打印方向对3单位临时固定义齿的断裂强度有显著影响。在增材制造的样本中,0°打印的样本与减材制造的样本显示出相似的断裂强度值。
就断裂强度而言,使用测试的3D打印临时树脂以0°和30°制作的3单位临时固定义齿可能是铣削PMMA的替代方案。