• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在创新治疗领域中对事前临床实物期权价值进行建模:ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌。

Modeling the Ex Ante Clinical Real Option Value in an Innovative Therapeutic Area: ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

The CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jun;40(6):623-631. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01147-5. Epub 2022 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-022-01147-5
PMID:35527331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9130184/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A drug that improves survival and/or disease progression can create real option value (ROV)-the additional health gain from future innovations enabled by a longer survival. ROV can be a relevant consideration for both clinical and payer decision-makers. We aimed to estimate the ex ante ROV for first-line (1L) alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We developed a Markov model to estimate life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with 1L alectinib versus 1L crizotinib due to potential future second-line (2L) drugs. Transition probabilities were derived from the phase 3 trial of 1L alectinib and phase 2 trial of 2L brigatinib. We identified drugs being studied in phase 2 and 3 trials in ALK-positive NSCLC at the time of alectinib's 1L approval and projected the likelihood and timing of their arrival and their potential efficacy based on publicly available data.

RESULTS

The discounted incremental LYs and QALYs for alectinib increased by 12.9% (95% CR - 2.96%, 34.82%; 1.25 vs. 1.11) and 11.2% (95% CR - 2.14%, 29.29%; 1.03 vs. 0.92), respectively, after accounting for ROV. The incremental ROV of alectinib was sensitive to the projected efficacy of future drugs, uptake level, and the hazard ratio of progression-free survival of alectinib (vs. crizotinib).

CONCLUSIONS

Ex ante ROV can be a significant value consideration in therapeutic areas with high levels of expected innovation. The potential efficacy of future drugs and incremental survival with alectinib at the projected time of arrival are important considerations in assessing ROV.

摘要

目的

能够提高生存率和/或疾病进展的药物可以创造实际期权价值(ROV)——通过延长生存时间为未来的创新带来的额外健康收益。ROV 可能是临床和支付方决策者都需要考虑的因素。我们旨在评估一线(1L)艾乐替尼在间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的预期提前 ROV。

方法

我们开发了一个马尔可夫模型,以估计与一线 1L 克唑替尼相比,一线 1L 艾乐替尼因潜在的二线(2L)药物而获得的生命年(LY)和质量调整生命年(QALY)。转移概率来自于 1L 艾乐替尼的 III 期试验和 2L 布加替尼的 II 期试验。我们确定了在艾乐替尼一线获批时正在进行的 ALK 阳性 NSCLC 的 II 期和 III 期试验中的药物,并根据公开数据预测了它们的到达概率、时间及其潜在疗效。

结果

考虑到 ROV,艾乐替尼的折扣增量 LY 和 QALY 分别增加了 12.9%(95%可信区间 -2.96%,34.82%;1.25 对 1.11)和 11.2%(95%可信区间 -2.14%,29.29%;1.03 对 0.92)。艾乐替尼的增量 ROV 对未来药物的预计疗效、吸收率以及艾乐替尼(与克唑替尼相比)无进展生存期的风险比敏感。

结论

在预期创新水平较高的治疗领域,预期提前 ROV 可能是一个重要的价值考虑因素。未来药物的潜在疗效和艾乐替尼在预计到达时间的增量生存是评估 ROV 的重要考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/609b56d23b46/40273_2022_1147_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/e9a702b3e612/40273_2022_1147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/2c5488a93871/40273_2022_1147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/b415263bd7ed/40273_2022_1147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/609b56d23b46/40273_2022_1147_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/e9a702b3e612/40273_2022_1147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/2c5488a93871/40273_2022_1147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/b415263bd7ed/40273_2022_1147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b924/9130184/609b56d23b46/40273_2022_1147_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling the Ex Ante Clinical Real Option Value in an Innovative Therapeutic Area: ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.在创新治疗领域中对事前临床实物期权价值进行建模:ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Jun;40(6):623-631. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01147-5. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
The cost-effectiveness of brigatinib in adult patients with ALK inhibitor-naive ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer from a US perspective.从美国视角评估布加替尼在未经ALK 抑制剂治疗的 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌成年患者中的成本效果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):970-979. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.970.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Ceritinib and Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.克唑替尼与塞瑞替尼和阿来替尼一线治疗间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果比较。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Feb;40(2):183-189. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00880-8.
4
Overall survival indirect treatment comparison between brigatinib and alectinib for the treatment of front-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer using data from ALEX and final results from ALTA-1L.使用来自ALEX的数据和ALTA-1L的最终结果,对布加替尼和阿来替尼治疗一线间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌的总生存进行间接治疗比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Sep;38(9):1587-1593. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2100653. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
5
Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALESIA): a randomised phase 3 study.阿来替尼对比克唑替尼用于未经治疗的间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性的非小细胞肺癌亚洲患者(ALESIA):一项随机的 3 期研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 May;7(5):437-446. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30053-0. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Cost Effectiveness of Alectinib vs. Crizotinib in First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.阿来替尼对比克唑替尼用于一线治疗间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性的晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0625-6.
7
Real-world adherence and persistence with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌中间变性淋巴瘤激酶抑制剂的真实世界依从性和持久性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Mar;28(3):305-314. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21310. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
ALTA-2: Phase II study of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on alectinib or ceritinib.ALTA-2 研究:布加替尼治疗阿来替尼或塞瑞替尼治疗后进展的 ALK 阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的 II 期研究。
Future Oncol. 2021 May;17(14):1709-1719. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1119. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Brigatinib vs alectinib in crizotinib-resistant advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALTA-3).布加替尼对比阿来替尼用于克唑替尼耐药的晚期间变性淋巴瘤激酶阳性非小细胞肺癌(ALTA-3)。
Future Oncol. 2021 Nov;17(32):4237-4247. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0608. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Indirect comparisons of brigatinib and alectinib for front-line -positive non-small-cell lung cancer.比较布加替尼和阿来替尼一线治疗阳性非小细胞肺癌的间接比较。
Future Oncol. 2022 Jun;18(20):2499-2510. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-0194. Epub 2022 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis: charting a path forward for measuring the societal value of medical technologies.广义成本效益分析:为衡量医疗技术的社会价值绘制前进道路。
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jan;14(1):e240213. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0213. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Valuing the Societal Impact of Medicines and Other Health Technologies: A User Guide to Current Best Practices.重视药品和其他卫生技术的社会影响:当前最佳实践用户指南。
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2024 Nov 8;27(1):29-116. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
3
Incorporating Real Option Value in Valuing Innovation: A Way Forward.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the Ex Post Real Option Value in Metastatic Melanoma Using Real-World Data.运用真实世界数据对转移性黑色素瘤的事后实物期权价值进行建模。
Value Health. 2021 Dec;24(12):1746-1753. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
Real-world evidence for option value in metastatic melanoma.转移性黑色素瘤的实际证据中的期权价值。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Nov;27(11):1546-1555. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21192. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Broadening the Concept of Value: A Scoping Review on the Option Value of Medical Technologies.
将实物期权价值纳入创新估值:一种前进的方式。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jul;42(Suppl 2):199-210. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01352-4. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
4
The value of the accelerated approval pathway: real-world outcomes associated with reducing the time between innovations.加速审批途径的价值:与缩短创新之间的时间相关的真实世界结果。
Future Oncol. 2024;20(16):1099-1110. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0514. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
拓宽价值观念:医疗技术期权价值的范围界定综述
Value Health. 2021 Jul;24(7):1045-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.018. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
United States Life Tables, 2017.《2017年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(7):1-66.
5
The Option Value of Innovation.创新的期权价值。
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2012 Apr 18;15(2):/j/fhep.2012.15.issue-2/1558-9544.1306/1558-9544.1306.xml. doi: 10.1515/1558-9544.1306.
6
How Does Option Value Affect the Potential Cost-Effectiveness of a Treatment? The Case of Ipilimumab for Metastatic Melanoma.选择价值如何影响治疗的潜在成本效益?以依匹单抗治疗转移性黑色素瘤为例。
Value Health. 2019 Jul;22(7):777-784. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Evolution of Cancer Pharmacological Treatments at the Turn of the Third Millennium.第三个千年之交癌症药物治疗的进展
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 13;9:1300. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01300. eCollection 2018.
8
The Option Value of Innovative Treatments for Metastatic Melanoma.转移性黑色素瘤创新疗法的期权价值
Forum Health Econ Policy. 2018 Jun 21;21(1):/j/fhep.2018.21.issue-1/fhep-2016-0014/fhep-2016-0014.xml. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2016-0014.
9
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2018.NCCN 指南解读:非小细胞肺癌,第 5 版,2018 年。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jul;16(7):807-821. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0062.
10
Financial toxicity and implications for cancer care in the era of molecular and immune therapies.分子和免疫治疗时代的经济毒性及其对癌症治疗的影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 May;6(9):166. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.28.