Suh Heeyeon, Garnett Bella Shen, Mahood Kimberly, Mahjoub Noor, Boyd Robert L, Oh Heesoo
Department of Orthodontics, University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Private Practice, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Korean J Orthod. 2022 May 25;52(3):210-219. doi: 10.4041/kjod21.180.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and mechanism of clear aligner therapy for the correction of anterior open bite in adult nonextraction cases.
Sixty-nine adult patients with anterior open bite were enrolled and classified into Angle's Class I, II, and III groups. Fifty patients presented with skeletal open bite (mandibular plane angle [MPA] ≥ 38°), whereas 19 presented with dental open bite. Fifteen cephalometric landmarks were identified before (T1) and after (T2) treatment. The magnitudes of planned and actual movements of the incisors and molars were calculated.
Positive overbite was achieved in 94% patients, with a mean final overbite of 1.1 ± 0.8 mm. The mean change in overbite was 3.3 ± 1.4 mm. With clear aligners alone, 0.36 ± 0.58 mm of maxillary molar intrusion was achieved. Compared with the Class I group, the Class II group showed greater maxillary molar intrusion and MPA reduction. The Class III group showed greater mandibular incisor extrusion with no significant vertical skeletal changes.
Clear aligners can be effective in controlling the vertical dimension and correcting mild to moderate anterior open bite in adult nonextraction cases. The treatment mechanism for Class III patients significantly differed from that for Class I and Class II patients. Maxillary incisor extrusion in patients with dental open bite and MPA reduction with mandibular incisor extrusion in patients with skeletal open bite are the most significant contributing factors for open bite closure.
本研究旨在探讨成人不拔牙病例中使用透明矫治器治疗前牙开(牙合)的有效性及机制。
纳入69例成人前牙开(牙合)患者,分为安氏Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类组。50例为骨性开(牙合)(下颌平面角[MPA]≥38°),19例为牙性开(牙合)。在治疗前(T1)和治疗后(T2)确定15个头颅侧位测量标志点。计算切牙和磨牙计划移动量与实际移动量。
94%的患者获得了正覆盖,平均最终覆盖为1.1±0.8mm。覆盖平均变化量为3.3±1.4mm。单纯使用透明矫治器,上颌磨牙平均压低0.36±0.58mm。与Ⅰ类组相比,Ⅱ类组上颌磨牙压低和MPA减小更明显。Ⅲ类组下颌切牙伸长更明显,垂直向骨骼无明显变化。
透明矫治器可有效控制垂直距离,矫正成人不拔牙病例中的轻至中度前牙开(牙合)。Ⅲ类患者的治疗机制与Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类患者明显不同。牙性开(牙合)患者上颌切牙伸长和骨性开(牙合)患者下颌切牙伸长导致MPA减小是开(牙合)关闭的最重要因素。