Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Services, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Department of Surgical Services, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Aug;28(8):683-688. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0429. Epub 2022 May 6.
The risks from opioid use are well known in and mandate nonpharmacological modalities for the management of postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of battlefield acupuncture (BFA) as an adjunct therapy for postoperative pain in U.S. veteran patients undergoing major surgery under general anesthesia. Patients undergoing major surgery performed under general anesthesia from June 2017 to June 2018 were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BFA or sham acupuncture. Outcomes such as pain intensity measured by visual analog scale score, opioid consumption, and the incidence of analgesia-related adverse effects were compared between the study groups. A total of 72 subjects were included in this study (36 subjects in each study group). The median 24-h opioid postoperative consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was lower in the BFA group compared to the sham acupuncture group (18.3 [±12.2] MME vs. 38.6 [±15.9] MME, < 0.001). Pain intensity reported by patients at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively was lower in the BFA group compared to the sham acupuncture group. The incidence of postsurgical nausea and vomiting was lower in patients receiving BFA compared to patients receiving sham acupuncture. There were no intergroup differences in terms of postoperative anxiety or hospital length of stay. The results from this study reveal the potential clinical benefits of using BFA for reducing pain intensity and opioid requirements in surgical patients.
阿片类药物使用的风险是众所周知的,因此需要采用非药物手段来管理术后疼痛。本研究旨在探讨战场针灸(BFA)作为辅助治疗美国退伍军人全麻下大手术后疼痛的有效性。
2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受全身麻醉下大手术的患者纳入本研究。患者随机分配接受 BFA 或假针灸治疗。比较两组患者的疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分)、阿片类药物消耗和镇痛相关不良反应的发生率等结局。
本研究共纳入 72 例患者(每组 36 例)。BFA 组术后 24 小时吗啡等效剂量(MME)的中位数阿片类药物消耗量低于假针灸组(18.3[±12.2]MME 比 38.6[±15.9]MME,<0.001)。与假针灸组相比,BFA 组患者术后 6、12、18 和 24 小时报告的疼痛强度更低。与接受假针灸治疗的患者相比,接受 BFA 治疗的患者术后恶心呕吐的发生率更低。在术后焦虑或住院时间方面,两组间无差异。
本研究结果显示,BFA 可能具有减轻手术患者疼痛强度和减少阿片类药物需求的临床益处。