Priyadarshini Subhadra, Rath Sudhanshu Kumar, Verma Chandini, Das Asima
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Science, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha India.
Research and Development, Kalinga Institute of Medical Science, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha India.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Oct;72(5):402-408. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01641-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
Outcomes of pregnancy in COVID 19-infected mothers are worse than in the general population. Due to immunological changes, antenatal women are more vulnerable to severe complications. The India has experienced two waves of the disease. We analysed whether the second wave of the disease had affected pregnancy outcomes differently by comparing pregnancy outcomes with those of the first wave.
The study population included all the women delivered in the same tertiary centre during both the waves. Maternal outcome parameters include maternal oxygen requirement, maternal ICU admission and maternal death. Foetal outcome parameters include APGAR scores, preterm deliveries and NICU admissions, maternal and foetal outcome parameters between the first and the second waves were compared.
Demographic parameters were similar in both the waves of COVID 19. No significant differences were found in pre-pregnancy comorbidities, high-risk pregnancies and mode of deliveries between the two waves. Maternal oxygen requirement increased in the second wave [first wave 6(4.7%) vs second wave 25(40.3%) (-value < 0.001)]. There was also a significant increase in ICU admission [4(3.1%) vs 8(12.9%)], which was in positive correlation with maternal oxygen requirement during the second wave ( = 0.81, < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in maternal death [2(1.6%) vs 2(3.2%)]. No significant change noted in neonatal outcomes except for an increase in neonatal sepsis [0 vs 5(8.1%)].
Mothers had more severe diseases during the second wave. But this did not translate into significant increase in maternal mortality and poor neonatal outcomes, possibly due to better preparedness.
感染新冠病毒的母亲的妊娠结局比普通人群更差。由于免疫变化,孕期女性更容易出现严重并发症。印度经历了两波新冠疫情。我们通过比较两波疫情期间的妊娠结局,分析第二波疫情是否对妊娠结局产生了不同影响。
研究人群包括在两波疫情期间于同一三级中心分娩的所有女性。孕产妇结局参数包括产妇氧气需求、产妇入住重症监护病房情况和产妇死亡情况。胎儿结局参数包括阿氏评分、早产和新生儿重症监护病房收治情况,比较了第一波和第二波疫情期间的孕产妇和胎儿结局参数。
两波新冠疫情期间的人口统计学参数相似。两波疫情期间,孕前合并症、高危妊娠和分娩方式方面均未发现显著差异。第二波疫情期间产妇氧气需求增加[第一波6例(4.7%) vs 第二波25例(40.3%)(P值<0.001)]。重症监护病房收治率也显著增加[4例(3.1%) vs 8例(12.9%)],且与第二波疫情期间产妇氧气需求呈正相关(r=0.81,P<0.001)。然而,产妇死亡情况无显著差异[2例(1.6%) vs 2例(3.2%)]。除新生儿败血症增加外[0例 vs 5例(8.1%)],新生儿结局无显著变化。
第二波疫情期间母亲所患疾病更为严重。但这并未导致产妇死亡率显著增加和新生儿结局不佳,可能是由于准备更充分。