Garg Ishika, Kumar Arun, Kumar Adarsh
Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Public Health Dentistry, Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):20-34. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2140.
Newer minimally invasive treatment options for improvement in appearance of dental fluorosis stains are gaining popularity in recent years.
To evaluate and compare the clinical success in esthetic improvement of resin infiltration, in-office bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide, enamel microabrasion, and resin infiltration with double infiltrant application on nonpitted fluorosis stains.
Seventy two patients aged between 6 and 12 years with nonpitted dental fluorosis stains on the upper anterior teeth were randomly selected and divided into four interventional groups: group 1- resin infiltration (RI), group 2- in-office bleaching using 35% hydrogen peroxide (B), group 3- enamel microabrasion (M), and group 4- resin infiltration with double infiltrant application (2RI). In each group, standardized photographs were taken preoperatively, immediate postoperatively and after 1, 3, and 6 months time interval postoperatively to assess the esthetic improvement (EI) and changes in white/brown surface opacities/stains (SC) using a Visual Assessment Scale (VAS).
RI and 2RI showed statistically significant results ( ≤0.05) followed by microabrasion and bleaching, for both the evaluation criteria (EI and SC) at all the follow-up intervals.
Resin infiltration is a promising procedure that demonstrated remarkable clinical success for improvement in esthetics of nonpitted fluorosis stains with stable long-term positive outcome.
Garg I, Kumar A, Kumar A. Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic Improvement of Resin Infiltration (RI) In-office Bleaching (B) Enamel Microabrasion (M) and Resin Infiltration with Double Application of Infiltrant (2RI) on Non-pitted Fluorosis Stains: A Randomized Six-month Interventional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(1):20-34.
近年来,用于改善氟斑牙色斑外观的新型微创治疗方法越来越受欢迎。
评估并比较树脂渗透、35%过氧化氢诊室漂白、釉质微磨除以及双渗透剂应用的树脂渗透对无凹陷型氟斑牙色斑进行美学改善的临床成功率。
随机选取72例年龄在6至12岁之间、上前牙有无凹陷型氟斑牙色斑的患者,分为四个干预组:第1组——树脂渗透(RI),第2组——35%过氧化氢诊室漂白(B),第3组——釉质微磨除(M),第4组——双渗透剂应用的树脂渗透(2RI)。每组在术前、术后即刻以及术后1、3和6个月时间间隔拍摄标准化照片,使用视觉评估量表(VAS)评估美学改善(EI)以及白色/棕色表面不透明度/色斑(SC)的变化。
对于所有随访间隔的两项评估标准(EI和SC),RI和2RI均显示出具有统计学意义的结果(≤0.05),其次是微磨除和漂白。
树脂渗透是一种很有前景的治疗方法,在改善无凹陷型氟斑牙色斑的美学方面取得了显著的临床成功,具有稳定的长期积极效果。
加尔格I,库马尔A,库马尔A。树脂渗透(RI)、诊室漂白(B)、釉质微磨除(M)以及双渗透剂应用的树脂渗透(2RI)对无凹陷型氟斑牙色斑美学改善的比较评估:一项为期六个月的随机干预研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022年;15(1):20 - 至34页。