Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Front Immunol. 2022 Apr 22;13:829634. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.829634. eCollection 2022.
Due to the complex mechanisms affecting anti-tumor immune response, a single biomarker is insufficient to identify patients who will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. Therefore, a comprehensive predictive model is urgently required to predict the response to ICIs. A total of 162 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing ICIs treatment from three independent cohorts were enrolled and used as training and test cohorts (training cohort = 69, test cohort1 = 72, test cohort2 = 21). Eight genomic markers were extracted or calculated for each patient. Ten machine learning classifiers, such as the gaussian process classifier, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM), were evaluated. Three genomic biomarkers, namely tumor mutation burden, intratumoral heterogeneity, and loss of heterozygosity in human leukocyte antigen were screened out, and the SVM_poly method was adopted to construct a durable clinical benefit (DCB) prediction model. Compared with a single biomarker, the DCB multi-feature model exhibits better predictive value with the area under the curve values equal to 0.77 and 0.78 for test cohort1 and cohort2, respectively. The patients predicted to have DCB showed improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) than those predicted to have non-durable clinical benefit.
由于影响抗肿瘤免疫反应的机制复杂,单一的生物标志物不足以识别将从免疫检查点抑制剂 (ICI) 治疗中获益的患者。因此,迫切需要建立一个全面的预测模型来预测对 ICI 的反应。共纳入了来自三个独立队列的 162 名接受 ICI 治疗的非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者作为训练和测试队列(训练队列= 69,测试队列 1= 72,测试队列 2= 21)。为每个患者提取或计算了 8 个基因组标志物。评估了十种机器学习分类器,如高斯过程分类器、随机森林和支持向量机 (SVM)。筛选出了三个基因组生物标志物,即肿瘤突变负担、肿瘤内异质性和人类白细胞抗原杂合性缺失,并采用 SVM_poly 方法构建了持久临床获益 (DCB) 预测模型。与单一生物标志物相比,DCB 多特征模型具有更好的预测价值,在测试队列 1 和队列 2 中的曲线下面积值分别为 0.77 和 0.78。与预测为非持久临床获益的患者相比,预测为具有 DCB 的患者的中位无进展生存期 (mPFS) 和中位总生存期 (mOS) 得到改善。