Wang Ying, Wang Qin, Peng Yalan, Zhang Yonggang, Li Nian
Department of Medical Administration, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Clinical School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Apr 7;2022:8334397. doi: 10.1155/2022/8334397. eCollection 2022.
Acupuncture clinical practice guidelines are authoritative medical recommendations developed by evaluating and integrating acupuncture-related evidence. However, their synthesis and dissemination are not integrated, and clinical practitioners require more credible effective evidence. The study aim was to systematically review problems disseminating acupuncture clinical practice guidelines to clinical practitioners, to facilitate evidence dissemination. This systematic review included searches of PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, and four major Chinese electronic databases (CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, and SinoMed) from inception to October 26, 2021. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted information, and evaluated the quality of included studies. A systematic review was subsequently performed. Eleven studies were reviewed: nine (81.8%) cross-sectional surveys and two (18.2%) systematic reviews. The evaluated clinical practice guidelines differed across studies; seven studies (63.6%) evaluated guidelines for a specific disease, one (9.1%) evaluated guidelines for acupuncture therapies (e.g., moxibustion and fire acupuncture), one (9.1%) evaluated US acupuncture guidelines and recommendations, and two (18.2%) did not describe the guideline content. The included studies used different evaluation indicators. Guideline dissemination problems included lack of guideline standardization, unclear target population, mismatch between guidelines and application environment, lack of reliable health economics evaluation, poor quality content of the recommendations, lack of linkage between recommendations and evidence, and disassociation of recommendations from clinical practice et al. The development and publishing of credible acupuncture clinical practice guidelines is urgently needed to improve the usability of guidelines and standardize and disseminate tools for analysing information to clinical practitioners and to help the domestic and international acupuncture community to apply evidence to practice. Recommendations for promoting the dissemination of acupuncture clinical practice guidelines are to define clinical events suitable for the target population, to develop recommendations relevant to clinical practice, to improve the evidence evaluation index system, and to further standardize the method and process of formulating guidelines.
针灸临床实践指南是通过评估和整合针灸相关证据制定的权威性医学建议。然而,它们的综合与传播并未整合,临床从业者需要更可信的有效证据。本研究旨在系统评价针灸临床实践指南向临床从业者传播过程中存在的问题,以促进证据传播。本系统评价检索了从建库至2021年10月26日的PubMed、EBSCO、Web of Science以及四个中国主要电子数据库(中国知网、维普、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库)。两名独立 reviewers 筛选文献、提取信息并评估纳入研究的质量。随后进行了系统评价。共纳入11项研究:9项(81.8%)横断面调查和2项(18.2%)系统评价。不同研究中评估的临床实践指南各不相同;7项研究(63.6%)评估了特定疾病的指南,1项(9.1%)评估了针灸疗法(如艾灸和火针)的指南,1项(9.1%)评估了美国针灸指南和建议,2项(18.2%)未描述指南内容。纳入研究使用了不同的评估指标。指南传播问题包括缺乏指南标准化、目标人群不明确、指南与应用环境不匹配、缺乏可靠的卫生经济学评估、推荐内容质量差、推荐与证据缺乏联系以及推荐与临床实践脱节等。迫切需要制定和发布可信的针灸临床实践指南,以提高指南的可用性,规范并向临床从业者传播信息分析工具,帮助国内外针灸界将证据应用于实践。促进针灸临床实践指南传播的建议包括定义适合目标人群的临床事件、制定与临床实践相关的推荐、完善证据评估指标体系以及进一步规范指南制定的方法和流程。