Suppr超能文献

审视普洛茨方格弄蝶(弄蝶科:珍弄蝶族)的复杂分类法。

Checking the checkered taxonomy of Plötz's checkered skippers (Hesperiidae: Pyrgini).

作者信息

Zhang Jing, Cong Qian, Burns John M, Grishin Nick V

机构信息

Eugene McDermott Center For Human Growth & Development, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9050, USA.

Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9050, USA.

出版信息

Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2022;10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6510282. Epub 2022 May 1.

Abstract

We present an analysis of the names proposed by Carl Plötz in 1884 for the New World species in the genus Hübner, [1819] facilitated by the genomic sequencing of extant primary type specimens comparatively with a larger sample of more recently collected specimens of these species and their relatives. The changes to nomenclature suggested here are only caused by the identity of primary type specimens as revealed by their phenotypes or through genomic sequencing. All neotypes are designated to stabilize nomenclature in agreement with the current usage of these names, which in unison agrees best with the information available about them. are designated for the following 5 taxa: [sic] Plötz, 1884 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires), Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Brazil: Minas Gerais), Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Mexico), [sic] Plötz, 1884 (type locality in "Central America", likely southern Mexico), and Skinner, 1906 (type locality USA: Texas, San Antonio). are designated for the following 4 taxa: Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality Colombia: Bogota), [sic] Plötz, 1884 (type locality Colombia: Bogota), [sic] Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in Mexico: Nuevo Leon), Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in "Central America", likely southern Mexico). As a result, and are objective synonyms. The following are junior subjective synonyms: of (Plötz, 1884), [sic] Plötz, 1884 of (Stoll, 1780) and of (Linnaeus, 1767). (Plötz, 1884) is a species-level taxon and not a subspecies of (Erichson, [1849])). Genomic analysis of the lectotypes of , , and establishes them as conspecific with (Grote, 1872), thus depriving a distinct species currently identified as from its name, that becomes a name for (Plötz, 1884) in accord with its lectotype identity; and are its junior subjective synonyms, but is a junior subjective synonym of . A new name Grishin (type locality USA: Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal) is proposed for the species misidentified as . Furthermore, genomic comparisons reveal two other new species and one new subspecies of Grishin, 2019: Grishin (type locality Mexico: Veracruz, Huatusco), Grishin (type locality Ecuador: Pichincha, Tandapi), and Grishin (type locality Curaçao: Hato Field) that are cryptic and can be confidently identified only by their genotype.

摘要

我们展示了对卡尔·普洛茨(Carl Plötz)于1884年为[1819年]胡伯纳属(Hübner)新大陆物种所提议名称的分析,这一分析借助现存主模式标本的基因组测序得以推进,并与这些物种及其近缘种的更多近期采集标本的更大样本进行了比较。此处建议的命名法变更仅由主模式标本的身份所导致,这些身份通过其表型或基因组测序得以揭示。所有新模标本的指定都是为了根据这些名称的当前用法来稳定命名法,而这些用法与关于它们的现有信息最为一致。为以下5个分类单元指定了新模标本:普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯),普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:巴西米纳斯吉拉斯),普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:墨西哥),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:“中美洲”,可能是墨西哥南部),以及斯金纳,1906年(模式产地:美国得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥)。为以下4个分类单元指定了新模标本:普洛茨,1884年(赫里希 - 沙费尔私人通信)(模式产地:哥伦比亚波哥大),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:哥伦比亚波哥大),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年(赫里希 - 沙费尔私人通信)(模式产地:墨西哥新莱昂),普洛茨,1884年(赫里希 - 沙费尔私人通信)(模式产地:“中美洲”,可能是墨西哥南部)。结果,[此处原文指代不明]和[此处原文指代不明]是客观同物异名。以下是次主观同物异名:[此处原文指代不明]的[此处原文指代不明](普洛茨,1884年),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年的[此处原文指代不明](斯托尔,1780年)以及[此处原文指代不明]的[此处原文指代不明](林奈,1767年)。[此处原文指代不明](普洛茨,1884年)是一个物种级分类单元,而非[此处原文指代不明](埃里克森,[1849年])的一个亚种。对[此处原文指代不明]、[此处原文指代不明]和[此处原文指代不明]的选模式标本的基因组分析确定它们与[此处原文指代不明](格罗特,1872年)同种,因此剥夺了当前被鉴定为[此处原文指代不明]的一个独特物种的名称,该名称根据其选模式标本的身份成为了[此处原文指代不明](普洛茨,1884年)的名称;[此处原文指代不明]和[此处原文指代不明]是其次主观同物异名,但[此处原文指代不明]是[此处原文指代不明]的次主观同物异名。为被误鉴定为[此处原文指代不明]的物种提议了一个新名称格里申(Grishin)(模式产地:美国亚利桑那州科奇斯县波特尔)。此外,基因组比较揭示了格里申属(Grishin)2019年的另外两个新物种和一个新亚种:格里申[此处原文指代不明](模式产地:墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州瓦图斯克),格里申[此处原文指代不明](模式产地:厄瓜多尔皮钦查省坦达皮),以及格里申[此处原文指代不明](模式产地:库拉索岛哈托菲尔德),它们难以识别,只能通过其基因型可靠鉴定。

相似文献

3
Taxonomic discoveries enabled by genomic analysis of butterflies.通过蝴蝶基因组分析实现的分类学发现。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2022 Oct;10(7):1-59. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7160429. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Genomics-guided refinement of butterfly taxonomy.基于基因组学的蝴蝶分类学优化
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2021;9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5630311. Epub 2021 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing butterfly systematics through genomic analysis.通过基因组分析推进蝴蝶系统学研究。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2025;12. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15531392. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Taxonomic advances driven by the genomic analysis of butterflies.由蝴蝶基因组分析推动的分类学进展。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2024;11(7). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10614309. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
3
Butterfly classification and species discovery using genomics.利用基因组学进行蝴蝶分类和物种发现。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2023;11(3). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8400884. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Genomic analysis reveals new species and subspecies of butterflies.基因组分析揭示了蝴蝶的新物种和亚种。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2023;11(6). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10372378. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
New taxa of butterflies supported by genomic analysis.由基因组分析支持的蝴蝶新分类群。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2024;12(3). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14037213. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
9
Taxonomic discoveries enabled by genomic analysis of butterflies.通过蝴蝶基因组分析实现的分类学发现。
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2022 Oct;10(7):1-59. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7160429. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomics-guided refinement of butterfly taxonomy.基于基因组学的蝴蝶分类学优化
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2021;9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5630311. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
Genomics Reveals the Origins of Historical Specimens.基因组学揭示历史标本的起源。
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 May 4;38(5):2166-2176. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab013.
3
Genomes of skipper butterflies reveal extensive convergence of wing patterns.阔翅蛱蝶基因组揭示了翅膀图案的广泛趋同进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6232-6237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821304116. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验