Zhang Jing, Cong Qian, Burns John M, Grishin Nick V
Eugene McDermott Center For Human Growth & Development, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9050, USA.
Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9050, USA.
Taxon Rep Int Lepid Surv. 2022;10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6510282. Epub 2022 May 1.
We present an analysis of the names proposed by Carl Plötz in 1884 for the New World species in the genus Hübner, [1819] facilitated by the genomic sequencing of extant primary type specimens comparatively with a larger sample of more recently collected specimens of these species and their relatives. The changes to nomenclature suggested here are only caused by the identity of primary type specimens as revealed by their phenotypes or through genomic sequencing. All neotypes are designated to stabilize nomenclature in agreement with the current usage of these names, which in unison agrees best with the information available about them. are designated for the following 5 taxa: [sic] Plötz, 1884 (type locality Argentina: Buenos Aires), Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Brazil: Minas Gerais), Plötz, 1884 (type locality in Mexico), [sic] Plötz, 1884 (type locality in "Central America", likely southern Mexico), and Skinner, 1906 (type locality USA: Texas, San Antonio). are designated for the following 4 taxa: Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality Colombia: Bogota), [sic] Plötz, 1884 (type locality Colombia: Bogota), [sic] Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in Mexico: Nuevo Leon), Plötz, 1884 (Herrich-Schäffer in litt.) (type locality in "Central America", likely southern Mexico). As a result, and are objective synonyms. The following are junior subjective synonyms: of (Plötz, 1884), [sic] Plötz, 1884 of (Stoll, 1780) and of (Linnaeus, 1767). (Plötz, 1884) is a species-level taxon and not a subspecies of (Erichson, [1849])). Genomic analysis of the lectotypes of , , and establishes them as conspecific with (Grote, 1872), thus depriving a distinct species currently identified as from its name, that becomes a name for (Plötz, 1884) in accord with its lectotype identity; and are its junior subjective synonyms, but is a junior subjective synonym of . A new name Grishin (type locality USA: Arizona, Cochise Co., Portal) is proposed for the species misidentified as . Furthermore, genomic comparisons reveal two other new species and one new subspecies of Grishin, 2019: Grishin (type locality Mexico: Veracruz, Huatusco), Grishin (type locality Ecuador: Pichincha, Tandapi), and Grishin (type locality Curaçao: Hato Field) that are cryptic and can be confidently identified only by their genotype.
我们展示了对卡尔·普洛茨(Carl Plötz)于1884年为[1819年]胡伯纳属(Hübner)新大陆物种所提议名称的分析,这一分析借助现存主模式标本的基因组测序得以推进,并与这些物种及其近缘种的更多近期采集标本的更大样本进行了比较。此处建议的命名法变更仅由主模式标本的身份所导致,这些身份通过其表型或基因组测序得以揭示。所有新模标本的指定都是为了根据这些名称的当前用法来稳定命名法,而这些用法与关于它们的现有信息最为一致。为以下5个分类单元指定了新模标本:普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯),普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:巴西米纳斯吉拉斯),普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:墨西哥),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:“中美洲”,可能是墨西哥南部),以及斯金纳,1906年(模式产地:美国得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥)。为以下4个分类单元指定了新模标本:普洛茨,1884年(赫里希 - 沙费尔私人通信)(模式产地:哥伦比亚波哥大),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年(模式产地:哥伦比亚波哥大),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年(赫里希 - 沙费尔私人通信)(模式产地:墨西哥新莱昂),普洛茨,1884年(赫里希 - 沙费尔私人通信)(模式产地:“中美洲”,可能是墨西哥南部)。结果,[此处原文指代不明]和[此处原文指代不明]是客观同物异名。以下是次主观同物异名:[此处原文指代不明]的[此处原文指代不明](普洛茨,1884年),[此处原文有误]普洛茨,1884年的[此处原文指代不明](斯托尔,1780年)以及[此处原文指代不明]的[此处原文指代不明](林奈,1767年)。[此处原文指代不明](普洛茨,1884年)是一个物种级分类单元,而非[此处原文指代不明](埃里克森,[1849年])的一个亚种。对[此处原文指代不明]、[此处原文指代不明]和[此处原文指代不明]的选模式标本的基因组分析确定它们与[此处原文指代不明](格罗特,1872年)同种,因此剥夺了当前被鉴定为[此处原文指代不明]的一个独特物种的名称,该名称根据其选模式标本的身份成为了[此处原文指代不明](普洛茨,1884年)的名称;[此处原文指代不明]和[此处原文指代不明]是其次主观同物异名,但[此处原文指代不明]是[此处原文指代不明]的次主观同物异名。为被误鉴定为[此处原文指代不明]的物种提议了一个新名称格里申(Grishin)(模式产地:美国亚利桑那州科奇斯县波特尔)。此外,基因组比较揭示了格里申属(Grishin)2019年的另外两个新物种和一个新亚种:格里申[此处原文指代不明](模式产地:墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州瓦图斯克),格里申[此处原文指代不明](模式产地:厄瓜多尔皮钦查省坦达皮),以及格里申[此处原文指代不明](模式产地:库拉索岛哈托菲尔德),它们难以识别,只能通过其基因型可靠鉴定。