Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Home Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
St John's Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Food Nutr Bull. 2022 Sep;43(3):340-350. doi: 10.1177/03795721221078361. Epub 2022 May 8.
Micronutrient deficiencies are a cause of significant public health burden and loss of gross domestic product, especially in developing countries. Multiple fortified salt can potentially address this challenge at scale and in a cost-effective manner.
This laboratory-based sensory trial evaluated the acceptability of quintuple fortified salt (QFS), that is, iodized salt (IS) fortified with additional 4 micronutrients: iron, folic acid, vitamin B, and zinc. Iodized salt and double fortified salt (DFS), that is, IS fortified with iron, are used for comparison.
Forty-five respondents were recruited by open invitations to the university staff and their families. Each study participant rated 10 food items each in a set of 3 identical preparations differing only in the salt used. A 5-point hedonic scale was used to rate each dish on 6 sensory attributes: appearance, color, aroma, taste, texture, and aftertaste. Finally, the dish was rated on the attribute of overall acceptability-a subjective combined score based on all sensory attributes considered together.
Among the 3 salt types, there was no difference in scores for the sensory attributes of appearance, aroma, taste, texture, and aftertaste, and the attribute of overall acceptability. Color in IS scored significantly higher than in QFS and DFS, but there was no difference between the scores of DFS and QFS.
The 3 salts IS, DFS, and QFS are comparable to each other in all sensory properties, except for color. This study concludes that QFS is organoleptically acceptable under ideal conditions.
微量营养素缺乏是造成重大公共卫生负担和国内生产总值损失的一个原因,尤其是在发展中国家。多种强化盐有可能大规模且以具有成本效益的方式解决这一挑战。
本实验室感官试验评估了五重强化盐(QFS)的可接受性,即加碘盐(IS)中添加了另外 4 种微量营养素:铁、叶酸、维生素 B 和锌。用于比较的还有加碘盐和双重强化盐(DFS),即加铁的 IS。
通过公开邀请,向大学工作人员及其家属招募了 45 名受访者。每位研究参与者在 3 组完全相同的准备中对 10 种食品进行了评价,每组准备仅在所用盐上有所不同。采用 5 分喜好度量表对每种菜肴的 6 种感官属性进行评价:外观、颜色、香气、味道、质地和余味。最后,根据所有感官属性综合考虑,对菜肴的整体可接受性进行评价,即主观综合得分。
在 3 种盐中,外观、香气、味道、质地和余味以及整体可接受性等感官属性的评分没有差异。IS 的颜色评分明显高于 QFS 和 DFS,但 DFS 和 QFS 的评分没有差异。
IS、DFS 和 QFS 这 3 种盐在所有感官特性上彼此相当,除了颜色。本研究得出结论,在理想条件下,QFS 在感官上是可接受的。