Independent consultant, Global Health and Nutrition, New Delhi, India.
Centre for Global Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):832-845. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00448. Print 2021 Dec 31.
Food fortification is a powerful strategy to reach large populations with multiple micronutrients added to a single food vehicle. The impact depends on the sustained provision and utilization of adequately fortified food by a large population (mainly in low-income and food-insecure settings). We apply a value chain (VC) analysis framework to diagnose and address the barriers to the uptake of encapsulated ferrous fumarate double fortified salt (DFS) distributed through public-sector-led DFS interventions in India.We adapt the VC requirements framework proposed by Henson and Humphrey to identify and categorize barriers along the DFS VC as technological, market-related, and policy-related. We conducted a desk review of published and unpublished literature on DFS and information available in the public domain, semi-structured interviews with VC stakeholders from the private sector, program data from implementing organizations, and participation in multistakeholder consultations on DFS.Major supply-side barriers were under-developed private markets, inconsistent demand from public markets, unpredictable returns-on-investments, and inadequate business incentives to invest in DFS. The product's weak consumer orientation, uncreated consumer demand, low awareness of fortified foods, inadequate nutrition signaling were significant demand-side barriers. Technological barriers related to the requirement of high-grade salt for DFS production and residual organoleptic property of mild discoloration of food. Policy barriers related to inadequate and irregular financing for distributing subsidized DFS through the public distribution system; insufficient policy support for risk-sharing and managing costs associated with fortification; and a weak institutional environment for sustaining DFS interventions.Building an enabling institutional environment, demand creation through consumer awareness, strengthening institutional markets through public financing, managing cost and risks through public-private partnerships, and assuring quality during commercial scale-up are critical interventions necessary to ensure impact at scale.
食品强化是将多种微量营养素添加到单一食品载体中,从而惠及大量人群的有效策略。其影响取决于能否持续向大量人群(主要是在低收入和粮食不安全的环境中)提供和利用充足强化食品。我们应用价值链(VC)分析框架,诊断和解决印度公共部门主导的强化盐双强化铁富马酸(DFS)干预措施中采用的包被铁富马酸双强化盐(DFS)推广所面临的障碍。我们采用 Henson 和 Humphrey 提出的 VC 需求框架,确定并分类了 DFS VC 沿线的技术、市场和政策相关障碍。我们对 DFS 的已发表和未发表文献以及公共领域的信息进行了桌面审查,对私营部门价值链利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,获取了实施组织的项目数据,并参与了 DFS 的多方利益攸关方磋商。主要的供应方障碍是欠发达的私人市场、公共市场需求不稳定、投资回报不可预测、以及缺乏投资 DFS 的商业激励。产品弱消费者导向、未创造的消费者需求、对强化食品的低认识、营养信号不足是显著的需求方障碍。与 DFS 生产所需的高级盐以及食品轻微变色的残留感官特性相关的技术障碍。与通过公共分配系统分配补贴 DFS 的资金不足和不规律、缺乏支持风险分担和管理与强化相关的成本的政策、以及维持 DFS 干预的薄弱体制环境有关的政策障碍。建立有利的体制环境、通过消费者意识创造需求、通过公共融资加强体制市场、通过公私合作伙伴关系管理成本和风险、以及在商业规模化阶段确保质量,是确保规模化影响的关键干预措施。