Suppr超能文献

非定制与定制下颌前移装置治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的效果相同。

Equal effect of a noncustom vs a custom mandibular advancement device in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

作者信息

Bosschieter Pien F N, Uniken Venema Julia A M, Vonk Patty E, Ravesloot Madeline J L, Hoekema Aarnoud, Plooij Joanneke M, Lobbezoo Frank, de Vries Nico

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Sep 1;18(9):2155-2165. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10058.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Numerous types of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are available to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea, varying from noncustom to custom devices. Only a limited number of studies have been performed to determine whether a noncustom MAD could be used to predict treatment success of a custom MAD. In this study, we investigated the potential of a new-generation noncustom MAD, by comparing its effectiveness with a custom MAD. We hypothesized that the effectiveness of the devices is similar with regard to both objective (polysomnography) and self-reported (questionnaires, adherence, and patient satisfaction) outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective randomized crossover study including a consecutive series of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Patients were randomized to start either with the noncustom or custom MAD. Both MADs were applied for 12 weeks, followed by polysomnography with MAD in situ and questionnaires. After the first 12 weeks of follow-up, a washout period of 1 week was applied. Equal effectiveness was defined as no significant differences in both objective and self-reported outcomes between both devices.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included; 40 completed the full follow-up. The median apnea-hypopnea index significantly decreased from 16.3 (7.7, 24.8) events/h to 10.7 (5.6, 16.6) events/h with the custom MAD ( = .010) and to 7.8 (2.9, 16.1) events/h with the noncustom MAD ( < .001). Self-reported outcomes significantly improved in both groups. No significant differences were found between both devices.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of a noncustom and custom MAD is comparable, which suggests that a noncustom MAD can be used as a selection tool for MAD treatment eligibility to improve MAD treatment outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Netherlands Trial Register; Name: The Use of a Boil and Bite Mandibular Advancement Device vs a Custom Mandibular Advancement Device in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Management; URL: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7249; Identifier: NL64738.100.18.

CITATION

Bosschieter PFN, Uniken Venema JAM, Vonk PE, et al. Equal effect of a noncustom vs a custom mandibular advancement device in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. . 2022;18(9):2155-2165.

摘要

研究目的

有多种类型的下颌前移装置(MAD)可用于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者,从非定制型到定制型不等。仅有有限的研究来确定非定制MAD是否可用于预测定制MAD的治疗成功性。在本研究中,我们通过比较新一代非定制MAD与定制MAD的有效性,来探究前者的潜力。我们假设这两种装置在客观(多导睡眠图)和自我报告(问卷、依从性和患者满意度)结果方面的有效性相似。

方法

这是一项单中心前瞻性随机交叉研究,纳入一系列连续性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者。患者被随机分为先使用非定制MAD或定制MAD。两种MAD均使用12周,随后进行MAD在位时的多导睡眠图检查和问卷调查。在最初12周的随访后,设置1周的洗脱期。同等有效性定义为两种装置在客观和自我报告结果方面均无显著差异。

结果

纳入58例患者;40例完成了全部随访。使用定制MAD时,呼吸暂停低通气指数中位数从16.3(7.7,24.8)次/小时显著降至10.7(5.6,16.6)次/小时(P = .010),使用非定制MAD时降至7.8(2.9,16.1)次/小时(P < .001)。两组的自我报告结果均显著改善。两种装置之间未发现显著差异。

结论

非定制MAD和定制MAD的有效性相当,这表明非定制MAD可作为MAD治疗适用性的选择工具,以改善MAD治疗效果。

临床试验注册

注册机构:荷兰试验注册中心;名称:在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停管理中使用煮沸咬合式下颌前移装置与定制下颌前移装置;网址:https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7249;标识符:NL64738.100.18。

引用

Bosschieter PFN, Uniken Venema JAM, Vonk PE,等。非定制与定制下颌前移装置在治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的等效效果。. 2022;18(9):2155 - 2165。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的口腔矫治器
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 8;7(4):141. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040141.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验