• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察亚利桑那州 2016 年枪支预先禁令对大图森地区枪支自杀率的政策影响:一项观察性研究。

Examining the policy effects of Arizona's 2016 pre-emption law on firearm suicide rates in the greater Tucson area: an observational study.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e058196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058196.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058196
PMID:35534056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086613/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2016, Arizona enacted SB 1487 to nullify Tucson's ordinance permitting the municipality to destroy confiscated and forfeited firearms and instead require the firearms to be resold to the public through an auctioneer. Our objective was to examine whether firearm suicide rates increased in Pima County (greater Tucson area) relative to other Arizona counties following the enactment of Arizona's 2016 pre-emption law.

DESIGN

An observational study of a natural policy experiment. We used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the effects of Arizona enacting SB 1487 on firearm suicide rates in Pima County. Our statistical analyses adjusted for county-level differences in population demographics (age, gender and race) and unemployment rates, as well as a proxy for firearm availability and mental health professional shortage area status.

SETTING

9 Arizona counties from 2014 to 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

A policy group was constructed using Pima County (Tucson area) observations. A comparison group was created using data from eight other Arizona counties. 54 county-year observations were analysed.

INTERVENTION

SB 1487, which pre-empted Tucson law and allowed firearms that were seized/surrendered to law enforcement to be recirculated instead of destroyed.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Annual rates of firearm and non-firearm suicides per 100 000 persons extracted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER system.

RESULTS

Over the study period, comparison group counties had an average of 14.87 firearm suicides per 100 000 persons per year, compared with 11.56 firearm suicides per 100 000 persons per year in Pima County. A 1.13 increase in Pima County's firearm suicides per 100 000 persons coincided with the enactment of Arizona's 2016 pre-emption law, relative to comparison group counties over the same period.

CONCLUSIONS

SB 1487 was associated with higher firearm suicide rates in Pima County relative to other areas not targeted by the law, assuming fewer firearms were destroyed and more firearms re-entered the greater Tucson area through 2019.

摘要

目的

2016 年,亚利桑那州颁布了 SB 1487 法案,使图森市允许该市没收和没收的枪支被销毁的法令无效,而是要求枪支通过拍卖商转售给公众。我们的目的是研究在亚利桑那州 2016 年颁布的预先禁令法之后,皮马县(图森地区)的枪支自杀率是否相对于其他亚利桑那州各县有所增加。

设计

一项自然政策实验的观察性研究。我们使用差异中的差异方法来估计亚利桑那州颁布 SB 1487 法案对皮马县枪支自杀率的影响。我们的统计分析调整了县一级人口统计数据(年龄、性别和种族)和失业率的差异,以及枪支可用性和心理健康专业短缺地区地位的代理指标。

地点

2014 年至 2019 年的 9 个亚利桑那州各县。

参与者

使用皮马县(图森地区)的观测结果构建了一个政策组。创建了一个比较组,使用来自其他八个亚利桑那州各县的数据。分析了 54 个县年观测结果。

干预措施

SB 1487 法案预先禁止了图森市的法律,并允许被执法部门没收/交出的枪支重新流通,而不是销毁。

结果

在研究期间,比较组各县每年每 10 万人中有 14.87 人死于枪支自杀,而皮马县每年每 10 万人中有 11.56 人死于枪支自杀。在同一时期,与比较组各县相比,皮马县的枪支自杀人数每年增加 1.13 人,这与亚利桑那州 2016 年预先禁令法的颁布相对应。

结论

假设到 2019 年,销毁的枪支减少,更多的枪支通过 2019 年重新进入大图森地区,SB 1487 与皮马县相对其他不受该法律影响的地区的枪支自杀率较高有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cbf/9086613/cbe31037249b/bmjopen-2021-058196f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cbf/9086613/dbb677672957/bmjopen-2021-058196f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cbf/9086613/cbe31037249b/bmjopen-2021-058196f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cbf/9086613/dbb677672957/bmjopen-2021-058196f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cbf/9086613/cbe31037249b/bmjopen-2021-058196f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the policy effects of Arizona's 2016 pre-emption law on firearm suicide rates in the greater Tucson area: an observational study.考察亚利桑那州 2016 年枪支预先禁令对大图森地区枪支自杀率的政策影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e058196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058196.
2
County-Level Variation in Changes in Firearm Mortality Rates Across the US, 1989 to 1993 vs 2015 to 2019.1989 年至 1993 年与 2015 年至 2019 年美国枪支死亡率的县级变化差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15557.
3
State Firearm Laws and Interstate Firearm Deaths From Homicide and Suicide in the United States: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Data by County.美国州级枪支法律与州际间涉及枪支的凶杀和自杀死亡案例:基于县的数据分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):692-700. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0190.
4
Trends and Disparities in Firearm Fatalities in the United States, 1990-2021.美国 1990-2021 年枪支死亡趋势和差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2244221. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44221.
5
Association Between Gun Law Reforms and Intentional Firearm Deaths in Australia, 1979-2013.澳大利亚 1979-2013 年枪支法律改革与故意枪杀死亡的关联性研究
JAMA. 2016 Jul 19;316(3):291-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8752.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" Self-defense Law on Homicide and Suicide by Firearm: An Interrupted Time Series Study.评估佛罗里达州“坚守阵地”自卫法对枪支凶杀和自杀的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):44-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6811.
7
Association of County-Level Poverty and Inequities With Firearm-Related Mortality in US Youth.县级贫困和不平等与美国青年枪支相关死亡率的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Feb 1;176(2):e214822. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4822. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
Alcohol policies, firearm policies, and suicide in the United States: a lagged cross-sectional study.美国的酒精政策、枪支政策与自杀:一项滞后的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10216-x.
9
Longitudinal Associations Between Healthcare Resources, Policy, and Firearm-Related Suicide and Homicide from 2012 to 2016.2012年至2016年医疗资源、政策与枪支相关自杀及杀人事件的纵向关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2043-2049. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05613-3. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Assessment of county-level proxy variables for household firearm ownership.县级家庭枪支拥有率代理变量评估。
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106571. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106571. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
How firearm legislation impacts firearm mortality internationally: A scoping review.枪支立法如何在国际上影响枪支死亡率:一项范围综述。
Health Policy Open. 2024 Aug 17;7:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100127. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
2
Formative reasons for state-to-state influences on firearm acquisition in the U.S.美国州与州之间对枪支获取产生影响的形成性原因
SSM Popul Health. 2024 May 23;27:101680. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101680. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Employee attitudes toward suicide prevention and Counseling on Access to Lethal Means: initial findings from an academic medical center implementing the Zero Suicide framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of county-level proxy variables for household firearm ownership.县级家庭枪支拥有率代理变量评估。
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106571. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106571. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Associations between mental health shortage areas and county-level suicide rates among adults aged 25 and older in the USA, 2010 to 2018.美国 2010 至 2018 年 25 岁及以上成年人心理健康短缺地区与县级自杀率的相关性。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;70:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Preventing Suicide Through Better Firearm Safety Policy in the United States.
员工对预防自杀和获取致命手段咨询的态度:在实施零自杀框架的学术医疗中心的初步发现。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1268300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268300. eCollection 2023.
通过美国更好的枪支安全政策预防自杀。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Feb 1;72(2):174-179. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000317. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
State Legislative Strategies to Pass, Enhance, and Obscure Preemption of Local Public Health Policy-Making.州立法策略通过、加强和模糊化对地方公共卫生政策制定的预先阻止。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
The Firearm Suicide Crisis: Physicians Can Make a Difference.枪支自杀危机:医生可以有所作为。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):265-268. doi: 10.1370/afm.2522.
6
Behavioral Health Care And Firearm Suicide: Do States With Greater Treatment Capacity Have Lower Suicide Rates?行为健康护理与枪支自杀:治疗能力更强的州自杀率是否更低?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Oct;38(10):1711-1718. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00753.
7
Type of Firearm Used in Suicides: Findings From 13 States in the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2005-2015.自杀中使用的枪支类型:2005-2015 年全国暴力死亡报告系统中 13 个州的调查结果。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Sep;65(3):366-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Criminal Justice and Suicide Outcomes with Indiana's Risk-Based Gun Seizure Law.印第安纳州基于风险的枪支扣押法对刑事司法和自杀结果的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Jun;47(2):188-197. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003835-19. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
State Preemption of Food and Nutrition Policies and Litigation: Undermining Government's Role in Public Health.州政府对食品和营养政策的干预和诉讼:破坏政府在公共卫生中的作用。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jan;56(1):47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.027. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States.枪支政策科学:对美国枪支政策影响的研究证据的批判性综合分析
Rand Health Q. 2018 Aug 2;8(1):5. eCollection 2018 Aug.