• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国州与州之间对枪支获取产生影响的形成性原因

Formative reasons for state-to-state influences on firearm acquisition in the U.S.

作者信息

Wang Xu, Macinko James, Porfiri Maurizio, Sipahi Rifat

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2024 May 23;27:101680. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101680. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101680
PMID:39148747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325079/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Firearm-related crimes and self-inflicted harms pose a significant threat to the safety and well-being of Americans. Investigation of firearm prevalence in the United States (U.S.) has therefore been a center of attention. A critical aspect in this endeavor is to explain whether there are identifiable patterns in firearm acquisition.

METHODS

We view firearm acquisition patterning as a spatio-temporal dynamical system distributed across U.S. states that co-evolves with crime rates, political ideology, income levels, population, and the legal environment. We leverage transfer entropy and exponential random graph models along with publicly available data, to statistically reveal the formative factors in how each state's temporal patterning of firearm acquisition influences other states.

RESULTS

Results help to explain how and why U.S. states influence each other in their firearm acquisition. We establish that state-to-state influences, or lack thereof, in firearm acquisition patterning are explained by states' percent of gun homicide, firearm law strictness, geographic neighborhood, and citizen ideology. Network-based characteristics, namely, mutuality and transitivity, are also important to explain such influence.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that state policies or programs that reduce gun homicides will also help suppress that state's influence on the patterning of firearm acquisition in other states. Furthermore, states with stricter firearm laws are more likely to influence firearm acquisition in other states, but are themselves shielded from the effects of other states' firearm acquisition patterns. These results inform future research in public health, criminology, and policy making.

摘要

目标

与枪支相关的犯罪和自我伤害行为对美国人的安全与福祉构成了重大威胁。因此,对美国枪支流行情况的调查一直是关注的焦点。这项工作的一个关键方面是解释枪支获取是否存在可识别的模式。

方法

我们将枪支获取模式视为一个分布在美国各州的时空动态系统,它与犯罪率、政治意识形态、收入水平、人口和法律环境共同演变。我们利用转移熵和指数随机图模型以及公开可用的数据,从统计学角度揭示每个州枪支获取的时间模式如何影响其他州的形成因素。

结果

结果有助于解释美国各州在枪支获取方面如何以及为何相互影响。我们确定,枪支获取模式中各州之间的影响或缺乏影响,可以通过各州的枪支杀人案百分比、枪支法律的严格程度、地理邻域和公民意识形态来解释。基于网络的特征,即相互性和传递性,对于解释这种影响也很重要。

结论

结果表明,减少枪支杀人案的州政策或项目也将有助于抑制该州对其他州枪支获取模式的影响。此外,枪支法律更严格的州更有可能影响其他州的枪支获取,但它们自身却能免受其他州枪支获取模式的影响。这些结果为公共卫生、犯罪学和政策制定方面的未来研究提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/1014eecdb9e7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/b72be7e47125/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/b85578120c00/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/bce69e314fde/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/782dac0b5115/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/1108a39fd154/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/1014eecdb9e7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/b72be7e47125/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/b85578120c00/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/bce69e314fde/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/782dac0b5115/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/1108a39fd154/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8112/11325079/1014eecdb9e7/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Formative reasons for state-to-state influences on firearm acquisition in the U.S.美国州与州之间对枪支获取产生影响的形成性原因
SSM Popul Health. 2024 May 23;27:101680. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101680. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020.暴力死亡监测 - 全国暴力死亡报告系统,2020 年,48 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 May 26;72(5):1-38. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7205a1.
3
What factors drive state firearm law adoption? An application of exponential-family random graph models.哪些因素推动了州级枪支法律的通过?指数家族随机图模型的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115103. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115103. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Modeling State Firearm Law Adoption Using Temporal Network Models.利用时间网络模型对州级枪支法的采用进行建模。
Milbank Q. 2024 Mar;102(1):97-121. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12677. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Social determinants of health in relation to firearm-related homicides in the United States: A nationwide multilevel cross-sectional study.与美国枪支相关的凶杀案有关的健康社会决定因素:一项全国性的多层次横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 17;16(12):e1002978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002978. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Impact on Nonfirearm Deaths of Firearm Laws Affecting Firearm Deaths: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.枪支法律对枪支死亡影响的非枪支死亡影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(10):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305808. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
Policy pathways to address American youth firearm injury and death.解决美国青少年枪支伤害和死亡问题的政策途径。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Apr 1;20(20 Suppl 1):2726. doi: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2726.
8
Firearm-Related Juvenile Death Rates Correlate With Gun Ownership Rates, Measures of Guns in Circulation, and Leniency of Existing Firearm Laws Among U.S. States.美国各州的与枪支相关的青少年死亡率与枪支拥有率、流通中的枪支数量以及现有枪支法律的宽松程度相关。
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.078. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
9
The lagged effect of state gun laws on the reduction of state-level firearm homicide mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2017.1999 年至 2017 年美国各州枪支法对降低州级枪支凶杀死亡率的滞后影响。
Public Health. 2020 Dec;189:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 34 States, Four California Counties, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2017.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统,2017 年,34 个州、加利福尼亚州的 4 个县、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Dec 4;69(8):1-37. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6908a1.

本文引用的文献

1
The Diffusion of Punitive Firearm Preemption Laws Across U.S. States.美国各州惩罚性枪支预先防范法的扩散。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):649-656. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.03.023. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
How have firearm laws changed in states with unexpected decreases or increases in firearm homicide, 1990-2019?1990年至2019年期间,在枪支杀人案意外减少或增加的州,枪支法律发生了怎样的变化?
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Feb 16;22:101364. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101364. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Spatiotemporal patterns of firearm acquisition in the United States in different presidential terms.
美国不同总统任期内枪支获取的时空模式。
Chaos. 2022 Jul;32(7):073115. doi: 10.1063/5.0096773.
4
What factors drive state firearm law adoption? An application of exponential-family random graph models.哪些因素推动了州级枪支法律的通过?指数家族随机图模型的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115103. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115103. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
5
Examining the policy effects of Arizona's 2016 pre-emption law on firearm suicide rates in the greater Tucson area: an observational study.考察亚利桑那州 2016 年枪支预先禁令对大图森地区枪支自杀率的政策影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e058196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058196.
6
The Association of Suicidal Ideation With Firearm Purchasing During a Firearm Purchasing Surge.自杀意念与枪支购买热潮期间枪支购买的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2132111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32111.
7
Firearm purchasing and firearm violence during the coronavirus pandemic in the United States: a cross-sectional study.美国新冠疫情期间的枪支购买与枪支暴力:一项横断面研究
Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 5;8(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00339-5.
8
Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间推特上的公众风险认知与情绪
Appl Netw Sci. 2020;5(1):99. doi: 10.1007/s41109-020-00334-7. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Self-Protection versus Fear of Stricter Firearm Regulations: Examining the Drivers of Firearm Acquisitions in the Aftermath of a Mass Shooting.自我保护与对更严格枪支管制的恐惧:审视大规模枪击事件后枪支购置的驱动因素
Patterns (N Y). 2020 Aug 11;1(6):100082. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100082. eCollection 2020 Sep 11.
10
Invisible wounds: Community exposure to gun homicides and adolescents' mental health and behavioral outcomes.无形的创伤:社区接触枪支杀人事件与青少年的心理健康及行为后果
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Nov 4;12:100689. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100689. eCollection 2020 Dec.