Prunty Megan, Rhodes Stephen, Sun Helen, Miller April, Calaway Adam, Kutikov Alexander, Plimack Elizabeth R, Ponsky Lee, Murray Katie S, Bukavina Laura
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1751-1757. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 May 6.
Gender disparities in editorial board composition exist across a variety of surgical subspecialties.
To investigate temporal variation in gender representation on the editorial boards of urology journals and assess the relationship between editorial board composition and female authorship.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed female authorship and editorial board composition between 2002 and 2020 among eight high-impact urology journals. Female publication status was assessed using publication records retrieved from PubMed. Editorial board information was manually extracted and titles were grouped for comparison as Editor-in-Chief, mid-level editor, and consulting editors.
Female representation across different editorial levels was analyzed via hierarchical logistic regression with additional terms to test for between-journal differences in overall representation and change over time. The relationship between representation on editorial boards and as publication authors was assessed at the journal level via correlation.
Eight journals and 49 412 articles were analyzed. No female has held the title of Editor-in-Chief for any of these eight journals in 18 yr. Significant growth was seen for mid-level editors, whereas no growth was seen for consulting editors. Neurourology and Urodynamics and Journal of Sexual Medicine had significantly higher than average female editorial board representation (p < 0.05). Across the eight journals, there was a statistically significant correlation between the proportion of overall female authors and female editors (r = 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.99). For all journals, the proportion of female contributing authors is greater than the proportion of female editorial board members.
Women in urology represent a small but increasing presence as editorial board members. Clear differences exist between journals, potentially attributable to specialty-specific demographics. Despite increasing representation, no female has ever been appointed Editor-in-Chief for any of the eight journals evaluated. At the journal-specific level, a positive correlation was observed between female editorial staff and female authorship. Given the implication of both academic authorship and editorial board assignment on academic advancement, actionable changes are outlined to guide improvement in gender diversity at the journal level.
Females are under-represented on the editorial boards for urology journals, although some roles have seen growth over time. Moreover, female editorial board membership is associated with representation of females among article authors. Gender disparities in both are noteworthy because they affect career paths and contribute to the gender gap in urology.
在各种外科亚专业中,编辑委员会的组成存在性别差异。
研究泌尿外科期刊编辑委员会中性别代表性的时间变化,并评估编辑委员会组成与女性作者身份之间的关系。
设计、设置和参与者:我们分析了2002年至2020年期间八本高影响力泌尿外科期刊的女性作者身份和编辑委员会组成情况。使用从PubMed检索到的出版记录评估女性的发表状态。手动提取编辑委员会信息,并将头衔分为主编、中级编辑和顾问编辑进行比较。
通过分层逻辑回归分析不同编辑级别上的女性代表性,并增加额外的项来测试期刊之间在总体代表性和随时间变化方面的差异。通过相关性分析在期刊层面评估编辑委员会成员代表性与作为发表文章作者的代表性之间的关系。
分析了八本期刊和49412篇文章。在这18年中,这八本期刊中没有女性担任过主编一职。中级编辑人数有显著增长,而顾问编辑人数没有增长。《神经泌尿学与尿动力学》和《性医学杂志》的女性编辑委员会代表性显著高于平均水平(p<0.05)。在这八本期刊中,总体女性作者比例与女性编辑比例之间存在统计学显著相关性(r = 0.93,95%置信区间0.65 - 0.99)。对于所有期刊,女性投稿作者的比例大于女性编辑委员会成员的比例。
泌尿外科领域的女性作为编辑委员会成员的人数虽少但在增加。不同期刊之间存在明显差异,这可能归因于特定专业的人口统计学特征。尽管代表性在增加,但在评估的八本期刊中,从未有女性被任命为主编。在特定期刊层面,观察到女性编辑人员与女性作者身份之间存在正相关。鉴于学术作者身份和编辑委员会任命对学术晋升的影响,概述了可行的变革措施以指导提高期刊层面的性别多样性。
泌尿外科期刊编辑委员会中女性代表不足,尽管随着时间推移一些职位有所增加。此外,女性编辑委员会成员身份与文章作者中的女性代表性相关。两者中的性别差异都值得关注,因为它们影响职业发展道路,并导致泌尿外科领域的性别差距。