Chirurgia (Bucur). 2022 Apr;117(2):154-163. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.2732.
The best way to start a paper like this is with a citation from W. Edwards Deming: Without data, you're just another person with an opinion. In the era of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) every surgical procedure has to be backed up by solid statistical data to offer our patients the best treatment. But is EBM always the path to truth? We decided to analyze the literature for achalasia and see if the guidelines and the data are reliable enough to justify a certain attitude. Practically, we engaged in this endeavor not because we do not trust the statements of the guidelines, but to see if a surgeon can find by themselves the proper attitude in this disease. Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by deficient relaxation of the inferior esophageal sphincter that results in dysphagia. There are several methods of treatment, with various statements in the guidelines. Currently, every treatment should be sustained by data and statistics, evidence-based medicine being mandatory when a method is preferred over another. This article reviews several studies and also the available guidelines in search for an answer to the question which procedure is the best.
开始这样的论文最好的方法是引用 W. 爱德华兹·戴明的话:“没有数据,你只是另一个有意见的人。” 在循证医学 (EBM) 的时代,每一个手术程序都必须有可靠的统计数据支持,为我们的患者提供最佳的治疗。但是 EBM 是否总是通向真理的道路呢?我们决定分析贲门失弛缓症的文献,看看指南和数据是否可靠到足以证明某种态度是合理的。实际上,我们从事这项研究并不是因为我们不相信指南的陈述,而是想看看外科医生是否能够自己在这种疾病中找到正确的态度。贲门失弛缓症是一种食管动力障碍性疾病,其特征是下食管括约肌松弛不足,导致吞咽困难。有几种治疗方法,指南中有各种说法。目前,每一种治疗方法都应该有数据和统计的支持,当一种方法优于另一种方法时,循证医学是强制性的。本文综述了几项研究和现有的指南,以期回答哪种手术方法是最好的问题。